Skip to main content

Type: Advice Update

Summary of updates – November 2014

Here’s a summary of the updates that we’ve made recently to our Information Hub.

About Criminal Records

  • The ACPO Criminal Records Office have recently launched a new on-line application system for Subject Access Requests. ACRO provides subject access disclosures from the Police National Computer on behalf of most police forces in England and Wales, Northern Ireland, Jersey and the Isle of Man. To make an on-line application, visit the ACRO website.
  • We have updated our information on what to be aware of if you have a ‘No Live Trace’ on a police certificates.

Applying for work

  • We have made available two videos on disclosing convictions to employers. One, entitled ‘Making your past pay’ was produced in association with Staffordshire and West Midlands CRC and the second follows one man’s journey whilst looking for employment and the consequences of his choices around disclosure.

Specific occupations and professions

  • We’ve received many enquiries from people looking to train as driving instructors. There seems to be conflicting advice from training providers as to who is eligible to join the Approved Driving Instructors Register and this information page provides a link to the Government eligibility wizard which details whether an individual would be eligible to join and how to apply.

The Google Effect

  • We have been asking users of our Information Hub to provide us with evidence of any successes they have had in getting Google to remove search results. We have recently become aware of an individual who has had links to his spent conviction for shoplifting removed by Google. Further information can be found here.
  • If your conviction is still unspent and/or a request to have search results removed by Google has been declined, you might find that your details of Google can cause you problems. You could try creating your own positive web content to try and suppress the negatives. There’s some information on ways to go about this on our Counteracting negative ‘Google’ entries page.

Travel

In other news….Unlock wins an award!

  • We’re delighted to announce that at the recent 2014 Helpline Partnership Conference, Unlock was awarded first prize in the ‘Best innovative use of technology’ category. This was, in part, because of our Information Hub. Explaining the reason for the award, the judges commented “The combination of offline and on-line technology bring together an accessible and impressive support package.” Read more about the award here.

Summary of updates – October 2014

Here’s a summary of the updates that we’ve made recently to our Information Hub.

Travelling and working abroad

  • There’s some new information about travelling to Mexico on holiday. Generally, entry is via a Tourist Card which does not ask questions about criminal records.
  • Following several enquires to our Helpline, we have published a document on working overseas. This provides a link to the entry requirements of various different countries around the world. It also highlights the role of an International Child Protection Certificate, which may be required for some roles overseas.

Specific occupations and professions

  • Anybody wishing to sell articles in the street or from a vehicle, kiosk or moveable stall will now require a Street Trading Licence, and the application process will usually ask about unspent convicions. Details of the application process can be found here.

Money

  • State retirement pensions are suspended if you receive a custodial sentence. This document looks at how your pension entitlement may be affected and what to do if you believe there are gaps in your National Insurance Contributions.

Community resolution orders

  • We have become aware that more police forces are using Community Resolution Orders when dealing with first time offenders committing minor offences or anti-social behaviour. Further information regarding the impact of receiving a Community Resolution Order can be found here.

Mental health

  • People with convictions can often feel unhappy, depressed, stressed or anxious. How we feel about ourselves can have an impact on  the way we behave and how we cope with the worries of everyday life and the tougher times that we sometimes face. To help, we have put together a list of useful links, ranging from simple ‘self-help’ ideas to professional and voluntary services, to maintain a positive state of mind and to help you take back control of your life.

Summary of updates – September 2014

Here’s a summary of the updates that we’ve made recently to our Information Hub.

Changes to the structure on the Hub – new ‘Advice’ section

  • We are continually looking at ways of improving the Hub to make the information more accessible. As part of this, we’ve created a new ‘advice’ section – this shares some of the common areas that people with convictions to us looking for our advice about. The advice we give is based on what we’ve learnt as an organisation when dealing with these issues, and the experiences of other people with convictions.
  • We’ve also got a new downloads section where you will find all Unlock materials which are available to download as PDF’s.

Going on a game show with a criminal record

  • Following some enquiries to our Helpline, we have published a document on getting on a game show with a criminal record. This looks at the questions you are likely to be asked by television production companies and the possible consequences of appearing on TV.

Ways to find out about your criminal record

  • There’s some information on how DBS Adult First Checks are used, who can apply for them and what the outcome of a check will mean to an applicant.

Police records

Specific occupations and professions

  • The Scrap Metal Dealers Act 2013 came into force on 1st October 2013 and requires all scrap metal dealers to undergo basic criminal record checks in order to trade. Further information relating to the legislation can be found here.

Money

  • You can no longer apply for a crisis loan if you live in England, Wales or Scotland. We’ve published some information on changes to crisis loans and short term payments available from Jobcentre Plus which provides details of the application process and eligibility criteria for hardship payments, short term advances and budgeting loans.

Applying for work

  • We’ve added a video in our support getting into work section produced by Inside Job Productions in partnership with one of the Work Programme providers which features ‘Rory’ and his story.

Free face to face appointments

As part of our work in delivering local information sessions, we’ve set up a series of dates where people with convictions can book a face-to-face appointment with one of our helpline advisers.

Appointments are available at our offices in Maidstone on the following dates:- 

Thursday 11th September 2014 – 4pm – 6pm

Wednesday 8th October 2014 – 4pm – 6pm

Thursday 13th November 2014 – 4pm – 6pm

Thursday 4th December 2014 – 4pm – 6pm

 

 What you can expect from us?

  • A warm welcome
  • A free 20 minute appointment where you can discuss your problem confidentially
  • Information and advice which may be supported by factsheets which you can take away and refer back to
  • Depending on your needs, referral to a different organisation that is better placed to help you
  • Honest, reliable and peer delivered information and advice.

Interested?

Telephone us on 01634 247350 or email advice@unlock.org.uk to book an appointment.

Help us raise awareness

Let your friends, family and colleagues know about our face to face appointments by downloading a leaflet here.

More information about these information sessions are available here

 

Summary of updates – July/August 2014

Here’s a summary of some of the updates that we’ve made recently to our Information Hub – self help information for people with convictions.

Criminal record checks

  • We’ve written a news update about challenging ineligible DBS checks. We’ve seen some interesting results so far, showing that individuals are successfully challenging employers who are doing the wrong level of check.
  • We’ve made a number of Freedom of Information requests to get information about how many criminal record checks were carried out in 2013/14, and the numbers that disclosed criminal record information. We’ve included this information in our section on types of criminal record checks.
  • We’ve got some data from the DBS which shows how often ‘police intelligence’ gets disclosed on enhanced checks, and we’ve included this in our information on police intelligence.

Employment

Insurance

  • We’ve updated our list of insurance brokers. There were a few changes to contact details, and there’s a further company that’s been added.
  • We’ve updated our detailed guide on insurance to feature some details about the MyLicence system being used for driving convictions and motor insurance.

We’re looking for examples of where ‘filtering’ doesn’t go far enough

We’re looking for examples of where ‘filtering’ doesn’t go far enough. Please read an update that we’ve published on our main site as part of our policy work on the DBS filtering process.

Challenging ineligible standard and enhanced checks

We continue to receive many enquiries from clients being asked to do standard or enhanced Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) checks for jobs which they don’t think are eligible for one.

We are often asked for a ‘list of job titles’ which are eligible – no such list exists. What makes a role eligible depends not only on the work that you will be doing but, the place you are working (i.e. a hospital).  In essence therefore, this can be quite a grey area.

Added to this, when recruiting, employers don’t always state very clearly whether they intend to carry out a criminal record check or what level will be applied for.  Employer’s often don’t make this clear because they assume that it doesn’t concern the majority of their applicants.  However, if you have a criminal record, it can be the most important part of the recruitment process.

Why is this important?

The level of check an employer can carry out is extremely important, particularly if you have spent convictions – these wouldn’t be disclosed on a basic check.  Likewise, if the police hold information about you locally, this wouldn’t be revealed on a basic or standard disclosure but might be disclosed on an enhanced disclosure. Details of what can be found on different levels of criminal records check can be found here.

Remember, once a criminal record check is carried out and an employer has the information, then it is difficult to stop them applying the information they’ve received to any recruitment decision that they’re making.

The application for a DBS check for an ineligible position is unlawful under the terms of the Police Act 1997.  If an individual knowingly  applies for a DBS check for a post which is not included in the Exceptions Order 1975 then they would be committing an offence by knowingly making a false statement for the purpose of obtaining or enabling another person to obtain a certificate.

How do I know if the role is eligible?

As we’ve already mentioned, there isn’t a definitive list. The types of positions which may be eligible for standard or enhanced checks are contained in the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 (Exceptions) Order 1975. These can be divided into five broad categories: –

  1. Professions
  2. Law & Order
  3. Certain Regulated Occupations
  4. Health and Social Care
  5. National Security

But not every job is eligible. We’ve heard from clients working in clerical roles in offices to mechanics in garages who have all been asked to do enhanced checks.  A particular favourite was a guy who, as part of his role, checked whether customer toilets met the company cleaning standards – another enhanced check requested!!

How do I raise concerns about an ineligible check without alerting my employers to the fact that something is likely to be disclosed on a DBS check?

We would always encourage anybody who believes that a check is ineligible to raise their concerns with the organisation if they feel able to. You will need to be careful not to raise suspicions that you have a criminal record and who you need to speak to will vary.  It will normally be somebody with recruitment or personnel responsibilities. We have an establishing eligibility section on the Hub that might help.

If the organisation insists on carrying out the check, you are not legally obliged to give your consent. However, if you refuse an employer will normally reject a job application. You may need to consider agreeing to the check, then raising a formal eligibility query with the DBS.

Challenging a potentially ineligible check

The time to use the DBS Eligibility Query process is when:

  1. you have spent convictions, and
  2. you’re applying for a job that says they will do a standard or enhanced check, and
  3. you’ve been offered the position, and
  4. you’ve been asked to consent to a DBS check

Once an application for a standard or enhanced check has been submitted to the DBS, you can use the Eligibility Query process to stop the check whilst the DBS investigate whether the check is lawful.  Details of the process can be found in the ineligible checks section of the Hub.

In a case where we helped an individual go through the eligibility process, they found the process relatively easy. The DBS requested additional information from both sides (applicant and organisation) but at all times managed to protect the identity of the applicant.  The DBS found in the applicants favour that an enhanced check was ineligible.

The results so far

As the case above shows, the Eligibility Query process is working. It’s fair to say that there are still problems with the overall system – for start, it shouldn’t be left to individuals to have to query individual applications.

However, in a recent Freedom of Information request, we asked the DBS how many times the DBS has written to employers under their Ineligible Applications Process. Between March 2012 and February 2013, they’d written to 3,311. Of those, the results were that 1,385 applications were not completed, which works out at 42% of the ones that the DBS looked into.

So the message we want to give is, if you think a job is carrying out an ineligible check, then challenge it.

As always, we’re keen to hear of examples where you’ve challenged an employer, either formally or informally. Send your examples to policy@unlock.org.uk.

Employers’ access to ‘subject access’ records will become a criminal offence

Update – February 2015 – This will now be coming into force on the 10th March 2015. See here for more information.

Update – December 2014 – The Ministry of Justice recently announced that this change to the Data Protection Act has been delayed and is expected to commence early 2015. We will publish a further update once we have an implementation date.

We’ve learnt today that the Ministry of Justice are planning to bring section 56 of the Data Protection Act (DPA) 1998 into force on the 1st December 2014.

Section 56 prevents employers from requiring people to use their subject access rights under the DPA to provide certain records, such as police records, as a condition of employment. It also prevents contracts from requiring certain records as a condition for providing or receiving a service, such as housing or insurance. Requiring people to provide these records will become a criminal offence, punishable by a fine. In England and Wales the maximum financial penalty on summary conviction in the magistrates’ court is £5,000 (soon to be unlimited). On indictment in the Crown Court the fine can be unlimited.

We’ve long argued that section 56 needs to be brought into force, but this wasn’t ever possible until reforms to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 were brought in on the 10th March 2014.

For people with convictions, this is an important development. Although it doesn’t prevent employers and others from getting access to criminal records through legitimate means (such as a basic disclosure through Disclosure Scotland or a standard/enhanced check through the Disclosure & Barring Service, depending on the job) what section 56 does do is prevent the use of significant amounts of sensitive personal data that can be disclosed as part of a subject access request.

In the past, we’ve come across examples where employers, insurers, education providers and housing providers have required people provide copies of their police record by applying to the police and paying £10 for a subject access request. This type of request discloses all information held on the Police National Computer, including convictions and cautions that are spent, as well as allegations or other ‘local police information’.

The introduction of section 56 on the 1st December will enable a clearer message to be given to any organisation that is found to be undertaking this type of practice. The legislation only allows requirements of this type where the record is required by law or is justified in the public interest. We understand that the Information Commissioners Office will be publishing guidance nearer to the date of implementation, to better explain how this will work in practice. In the meantime, there is a helpful blog on the ICO website.

This measure follows on from reforms to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 announced in a Written Ministerial Statement on the 13th February 2014.

Supreme Court ruling on criminal record checks / Filtering process

Today the Supreme Court ruled on a case that’s been going through the courts for some time. An earlier Court of Appeal case is what led to the ‘filtering process’ being introduced by the Disclosure & Barring Service.

The reason for this post is to just make it clear that, as a result of today’s judgement, we don’t expect any changes to be made to the filtering process. It was suspected by some that the reason the Government were appealing was so that they could remove the filtering process all together. The fact that they lost their appeal means that the filtering process stays.

The read more about today’s judgement, read the update on our main site.

For more practical information on the filtering process as it stands, click here.

An update on the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974

It’s been just over 3 months since the changes to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 came into force in England & Wales. At that time, we published an update which featured new materials that we’d produced, as well as our updated detailed guidance.

Since that point, we’ve learnt quite a bit about how these changes are working in practice, mainly through cases that have come through our helpline. So we thought it was about time we produced another update, highlighting a couple of important practical areas.

Get a copy of your basic disclosure

As you will read below, there have been quite a few examples where people have been surprised to see what’s on their basic disclosure. Often, this is because they thought that their convictions were spent since the ROA changes came in, but for various reasons, that hasn’t been the case.

As a result, and given many people are relying on the ROA changes to make important life-decisions (such as moving jobs, applying for jobs without disclosing, not having to disclose when buying insurance), we think it’s important to emphasise the importance of checking for yourself by applying for our own basic disclosure. It costs £25. This will allow you to raise any queries that you might have, and make sure ultimately that what you think is spent and unspent is actually the case.

Find out more about basic disclosures.

Court orders

One area is has caused a lot of confusion is how ‘court orders’ are treated by the Act. We’ve seen many people think that their conviction becomes spent earlier than what it seems to be doing, because they didn’t realise that alongside their conviction they were given a ‘court order’ that can have an effect on the rehabilitation period.

The most common court orders we’ve found causing people difficulties are Compensation Orders, Restraining Orders and Sexual Offence Prevention Orders.

For example, if somebody received a 1 year community order as an adult, this would normally become spent 1 year after the end of the order. However, if they were also given a 3 year restraining order, the conviction wouldn’t become spent until that order ends

The way in which these ‘ancillary orders’ (as they’re known) are impacting on how long it takes for a conviction to become spent is something that we’re collecting evidence about at the moment. If you have a copy of your basic disclosure which shows that your conviction is still unspent because of a court order, please send us copies, as we’re keen to understand what types of orders this is affecting – email them to policy@unlock.org.uk.

Find out more about court orders in our detailed guidance.

SOPOs and Sexual Offences

Another area of confusion relates to Sexual Offence Prevention Orders (SOPO’s). The view of the Ministry of Justice is that SOPO falls within the definition in the ROA of an “order that imposes a prohibition”, so the rehabilitation period ends on the date when the prohibition ceases to have effect. This will depend on the length of the SOPO. This means that a conviction cannot become spent until the SOPO that relates to that conviction ends. It follows that if a SOPO is imposed for an indefinite period then it will be subject to disclosure indefinitely, until the SOPO is ended in some other way (e.g. going back to court to get the end date amended).

Find out more about SOPO’s.

However, this is separate to the sexual offender notification requirement. This does not constitute “any disqualification, disability, prohibition or other penalty” and so does not effect when a conviction becomes spent.

Compensation orders

These are only regarded as spent once they are paid in full. Unfortunately, there is no record kept on the Police National Computer that compensation orders are paid, and this is all that Disclosure Scotland see when they process basic checks.

This means that Disclosure Scotland advise people to try and obtain proof of payment from the court and keep this document to prove that the compensation order has been paid in full.

This is something that we are challenging at the moment, as we don’t believe that this system is workable. It’s not particularly clear when you apply for a basic disclosure that you have to provide this proof, and many people don’t even realise they have a compensation order. If you end up receiving your disclosure without providing proof, you have to pay for another application, alongside your proof of payment, to have an accurate one issued.

However, while this situation remains as it is, you’ll need to provide proof. In England & Wales, you can obtain a letter of confirmation from the court when any compensation order has been paid in full. There is guidance in the magistrates’ courts’ staff manual as to the wording to be used in a proof of payment letter relating to compensation orders. If you didn’t get this at the time of paying the compensation, you should be able to get something from the court at a later stage.

A copy of that letter should be provided to Disclosure Scotland either with your application or separately in confidence if your application is being submitted via a third party.

To submit proof of payment independently of submitting an application, you can send it:

You should quote your application barcode or reference number, or your name, current address, and date of birth in your communication.

Once you’ve submitted proof once, Disclosure Scotland should keep this on file in case you have to apply for a further disclosure in the future.

Extended ‘supervision periods’ under the Offender Rehabilitation Act 2013

As part of the Government’s recent changes to prisons, probation and sentences, people sentenced to less than 12 months in prison will have an ‘extended supervision period’ meaning that they’ll have at least 12 months supervision on release. This has led to questions about whether this effects when a conviction becomes spent under the ROA. We can confirm that the headline sentence will remain the same for ROA purposes. The ‘buffer’ part of the rehabilitation period will start from the end of the original sentence.  The extra supervision period is post-sentence and does not affect the rehabilitation period for the conviction.

For example, if somebody was convicted as an adult in June 2014 and given 5 months in prison, the end of their sentence would be November 2014, so the conviction would become spent 2 years later (i.e. November 2016). The fact that the individual might be subject to ‘extended supervision’ into 2015 does not effect the ‘end of the sentence’ under the ROA.

Motoring convictions

There remains a lot of confusion about the way that motoring convictions are being dealt with under the ROA, particularly given the way that motoring offences are recorded (or not) on the Police National Computer, and what this means in practice for individuals in terms of applying for employment and insurance. We are working on some specific guidance at the moment on this, so if you have any information or experiences that you think would help with this guidance, please send them to policy@unlock.org.uk.

‘Easy Read’ guide on the ROA

Let’s not beat around the bush – the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act is still very complicated. Sadly, the Ministry of Justice’s guidance doesn’t do much to help make this issue easier to understand.

We have been pleased with the feedback we’ve had to the materials we produced when the reforms came into force – including our A3 poster, brief guidance and detailed guide. But we felt we needed something else.

So we were delighted to work in partnership with KeyRing to produce an ‘Easy Read’ guide on disclosing criminal records. ‘Easy Read’ documents present information using simple words and pictures that make information easier to understand.

Download the Easy Read guide.

Updated ‘ROA FAQs’ section

We’ve had some weird and wonderful questions in the last couple of months about how the ROA works. We’ve been working hard to keep a track of some of the most common ones, and we’ve recently updated our FAQ’s section on the ROA with some of these.

Send us your examples/evidence

We are constantly looking to gather examples and evidence of the issues that surround the way the new Rehabilitation of Offenders Act reforms are working in practice. If you were surprised to see what’s come back on your basic disclosure, or if you’ve experienced some of the issues that we’ve mentioned in this update, please send any evidence you have (including copies of disclosures). Any details you send will be held confidentially, and only be used anonymously as part of our advocacy and policy work. Please send them to policy@unlock.org.uk.

We want to make sure that our website is as helpful as possible.

Letting us know if you easily found what you were looking for or not enables us to continue to improve our service for you and others.

Was it easy to find what you were looking for?

Thank you for your feedback.

12.5 million people have criminal records in the UK. We need your help to help them.

Help support us now