Today the Supreme Court ruled on a case that’s been going through the courts for some time. An earlier Court of Appeal case is what led to the ‘filtering process’ being introduced by the Disclosure & Barring Service.
The reason for this post is to just make it clear that, as a result of today’s judgement, we don’t expect any changes to be made to the filtering process. It was suspected by some that the reason the Government were appealing was so that they could remove the filtering process all together. The fact that they lost their appeal means that the filtering process stays.
The read more about today’s judgement, read the update on our main site.
For more practical information on the filtering process as it stands, click here.
Learn more about this topic
- Unlock responds to the Government’s Youth Justice White Paper
- Unlock propose new clause to press regulator on reporting on spent offences
- We’re hiring! Head of Operations, Governance and Programmes Support
- Anne Fox announced as Unlock’s new Chair of Trustees
- FairChecks submits evidence to government inquiry on youth unemployment
Most popular articles from Unlock
- Monthly summary – May 2018
- Raising awareness in prisons of changes to the ROA
- Summary of updates – April 2015
- Help us to scrap ‘disqualification by association’: The government are consulting on changes to the childcare disqualification arrangements
- Has a criminal record in early adulthood held you back? We want to hear from you!

Comments
Add Comment