The filtering rules set up following Supreme Court’s judgment in R (On the application of T and another) [2014] UKSC 35 mean some cautions and convictions can be filtered from standard and enhanced DBS checks after a period of time. Convictions for specified offences, custodial or suspended sentences and multiple convictions could not be filtered.
In R (On the application of P, G and W) [2019] UKSC 3, it was argued that the rules didn’t go far enough. The court ruled that multiple convictions ought to be filterable, and we’re gathering evidence to show how important it is that these changes are made quickly.
We’d like to hear from you if:
- you’ve only been to court once, but you were charged for two ‘counts’.
- you have two separate convictions.
We still don’t think these changes go far enough to help people move on positively with their lives. The court did not rule that the list of offences that can never be filtered should be changed. None of the cases addressed the question of whether custodial or suspended sentences should be filtered. We are gathering evidence to show why this should change. We want to hear from you if you:
- served a short prison sentence, or suspended sentence, for an offence that could be filtered
- have a caution or conviction for an offence that currently cannot be filtered – such as
- Assault occasioning ABH (s.47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861)
- Robbery (s.8 Theft Act 1981)
- Loitering for purposes of prostitution (s.27 Sexual Offences Act 1992)
What we need from you
If you are affected by the filtering rules, contact us at policy@unlock.org.uk using the subject header ‘Call for evidence: DBS filtering’. Please include:
- Your name
- Your date of birth
- Contact details (email and telephone) and how you’d be happy for us to contact you
- Which example above you think your case fits into
- Details of your cautions/convictions including the dates and a DBS certificate if you have one
- The difficulties you’ve faced, recently or in the past, as a result of your criminal record not being filtered.
- Whether you would be willing to contribute to any media coverage on this issue in future (this is for our reference, we won’t share your details without consent)
Any information you provide will be kept in line with our confidentiality policy. Any personal information provided to us will not be shared externally without your consent.
Find out more about how we handle your data.
Find out more about our work on DBS filtering
Comments
Add CommentLeave a Reply
Learn more about this topic
Most popular articles from Unlock
Do you need help & support with an issue you’re facing?
We provide support and advice for people in England and Wales who need guidance with either their own, or someone else’s, criminal record.
Please use the search box to start typing your issue. If you cannot find an answer to your problem then you’ll be given options to contact us directly.
Popular advice
- Travelling to the US – Will I get a visa?
- Travelling to the UK
- Disclosing unspent convictions to existing insurers
- Overview of the DBS
- Information: Relationships, children and dealing with social services
- Becoming a childminder
- Information contained on UK passports
- What will be disclosed on a basic DBS check?
The system seems to be rigged to hold people down. It is as if they do not want you to become successful or ‘rehabilitated’. It has been 15 years since my conviction and I have behaved and worked extremely hard, earning a 6 figure salary at a point. That was in spite of the abuse I received by others.
If you want people to pay taxes and move forward, there needs to come a time that you allow them to be more than what they were. I’m a different person to who I was 15 years ago, why is none of that taken into account?