In most areas of England & Wales, there are long waiting lists for social housing and more often than not, a shortage of housing stock.
To address this issue, some social housing providers will have restrictions on who can apply for housing. Providers may decide that houses or flats will only be offered to people who come from the local area, or that they will not house people with particular criminal histories, or that some types of accommodation are for people in particular age bands.
Social housing providers can decide who does and does not qualify to be added to the waiting list. People who do not qualify may for example include people convicted of selling drugs or those that have in the past been violent towards a member of council staff.
If you are applying for registration on the housing list, most application forms will ask about criminal records. Legally, you only need to disclose unspent convictions.
In the past, social housing providers have been guilty of asking applicants to provide them with Subject Access Requests, something which was made illegal in March 2015 (find out more here). Some providers continue to ask misleading questions, not making it clear that applicants only need disclose unspent convictions. As a result of this, it is possible that individuals could over disclose their criminal record and that some providers will take spent convictions into account.
But housing providers beware! Earlier this year, Hammersmith and Fulham Borough Council were found to have acted unlawfully by basing its decision not to add an individual to its housing register on the fact that the claimant (YA) had a spent conviction.
YA was convicted of several offences between the ages of 12 and 15 including theft, criminal damage, assault and possession of Class A drugs. At the time of the offence, he was under the care of the council which was how they were aware of his background.
He applied to go on his local council housing register when he was aged 19 and, although the council acknowledged that his convictions were spent, they stated that he would not be eligible to be added to the register because:
- His behaviour remained relevant even if the conviction resulting from it was spent
- The behaviour included incidents which were ‘hardly minor matters’, which the council was entitled to take into account
The High Court found that:
- The decision amounted to a breach of Section 4 (1) of the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
- The decision was irrational
We see this is an extremely good result and it will no doubt have implications for other social housing providers.
The court have made it very clear that if you have spent convictions and are asked to disclose them, then you can treat the question as not being relevant to you.
In preventing themselves from future legal action, housing providers should make sure that if they’re asking applicants to disclose criminal records, they make it clear that spent criminal records do not need to be disclosed.
If you believe that your criminal record is having an impact on your ability to apply for social housing then we’d like to hear from you. Read more about the policy work we’re doing on this issue.
For more information
- For practical self-help information – More information is available on our housing section
- To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
- Our policy work – Read about the policy work we’re doing on criminal records and social housing
- Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact theHelpline.
Comments
Add CommentLeave a Reply
Learn more about this topic
Most popular articles from Unlock
- What gets me up in the morning? It’s about people
- Are there any advantages to disclosing your criminal record to your jobcentre/work programme advisor?
- European criminal record checks
- The importance of being honest if you’re asked to disclose your criminal record
- One conviction or multiple offences? The DBS filtering process
I am being discriminated by Hammersmith & Fulham Council in terms of a full duty for housing. I have been housed in hostels and supported housing for over three years. I am 27 years of age and have protected characteristics. I am currently living in a YMCA. I am in receipt of PIP and soon to be an expectant father. I have enduring mental health. Since requesting sight of a copy of my housing plan on 6.12.22 which was not provided to me before being placed and neither was a housing plan discussed with me and requesting a housing review . I have been the subject of harassment in the YMCA and asked by the management to find move on accommodation myself as the YMCA does not offer support. False accusations and assumptions have been made both by H&F and the YMCA. H&F have stated that the YMCA is suitable for me to co-parent my expectant child who is in due in October 2023 and is being bias in attempts to disregard my mental Heath and disabilities/vulnerabilities/priority needs verses a criminal record. I have been given 14 days to respond to the housing review decision before the decision is made final. Can you assist.
Hi
In order for us to assist you further, we would need additional information about your criminal record. Could you give our helpline a call on 01634 247350.
Kind regards