We’re quoted in an article in The Telegraph on how needlessly telling insurance firms about expired penalty points for speeding and other offences adds £57 to premiums, yet insurers continue to ask about old convictions .
“The law is a mess and grossly unfair on drivers,” said Chris Stacey of Unlock. “We now have a situation where a minor driving offence carries a longer rehabilitation period than someone who has gone to prison for assault.
“Insurers have lobbied to keep the blanket five-year period for motoring offences because getting rid of it would restrict their ability to charge drivers higher premiums for old offences”, he said. You can read the full article here.
Learn more about this topic
- Unlock responds to the Government’s Youth Justice White Paper
- Unlock propose new clause to press regulator on reporting on spent offences
- We’re hiring! Head of Operations, Governance and Programmes Support
- Anne Fox announced as Unlock’s new Chair of Trustees
- FairChecks submits evidence to government inquiry on youth unemployment
Most popular articles from Unlock
- Raising awareness in prisons of changes to the ROA
- Help us to scrap ‘disqualification by association’: The government are consulting on changes to the childcare disqualification arrangements
- Has a criminal record in early adulthood held you back? We want to hear from you!
- Unlock welcomes publication of PSA safeguarding consultation report
- Primary school teachers/staff ‘disqualified by association’

Comments
Add Comment