Louise Haigh’s offence would never have disqualified her from becoming a Member of Parliament as disqualification only applies when a person receives a prison sentence of over one year.
Her offence resulted in a conditional discharge from the Magistrates Court and whilst a conditional discharge sits on a person’s record, it’s not classed as a conviction unless the conditions are breached.
Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, there was no legal requirement for Louise to disclose it. However, she chose to be open and transparent when she was appointed a shadow minister in 2020 and when she was appointed a minister in 2024.
After 11 years the conditional discharge would not have shown on any level of criminal record check.
We are not aware how this information has entered the public domain however the situation demonstrates the lack of protection for individuals when a spent convictions comes to light and how stigma and discrimination continue to impact people who have been through the criminal justice system beyond what the law requires.
Learn more about this topic
- ‘Naming and Shaming’ clause scrapped from the Sentencing Bill
- Remembering Doug Yarnton, Helpline Coordinator
- The Right to be Forgotten – Rehabilitation in the digital age
- Unlock joins calls urging ministers to scrap plans to name and shame people on community sentences
- ‘Unlock the Vote’ for people serving sentences in prison
Most popular articles from Unlock
- What can’t you do with a criminal record? A life sentence?
- Government should consider a statutory “ban the box” for all employers and improve the support to people released from prison
- Immigration and nationality decisions are now exempt from the ROA
- Should former offenders be employed to mentor ex-prisoners?
- A-Z of job roles and their eligibility for basic, standard and enhanced criminal record checks

Comments
Add Comment