Louise Haigh’s offence would never have disqualified her from becoming a Member of Parliament as disqualification only applies when a person receives a prison sentence of over one year.
Her offence resulted in a conditional discharge from the Magistrates Court and whilst a conditional discharge sits on a person’s record, it’s not classed as a conviction unless the conditions are breached.
Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, there was no legal requirement for Louise to disclose it. However, she chose to be open and transparent when she was appointed a shadow minister in 2020 and when she was appointed a minister in 2024.
After 11 years the conditional discharge would not have shown on any level of criminal record check.
We are not aware how this information has entered the public domain however the situation demonstrates the lack of protection for individuals when a spent convictions comes to light and how stigma and discrimination continue to impact people who have been through the criminal justice system beyond what the law requires.
Learn more about this topic
- Unlock joins calls urging ministers to scrap plans to name and shame people on community sentences
- ‘Unlock the Vote’ for people serving sentences in prison
- Unlock comment: Naming and shaming in the Sentencing Bill
- MoJ’s AI Action Plan for Justice raises questions for people with criminal records
- Unlock stands in support of Mandela Day
Most popular articles from Unlock
Do you need help & support with an issue you’re facing?
We provide support and advice for people in England and Wales who need guidance with either their own, or someone else’s, criminal record.
Please use the search box to start typing your issue. If you cannot find an answer to your problem then you’ll be given options to contact us directly.
Comments
Add Comment