Unlock and the Standing Committee for Youth Justice (SCYJ) have written to the Justice Select Committee (JSC) regarding our concerns over the Government’s response to the JSC’s inquiry into the disclosure of childhood criminal records.
Christopher Stacey, Co-director of Unlock, sets out our concerns that the Government is using the Supreme Court case on DBS check filtering, expected to be heard in June, as an excuse for not addressing the recommendations made by the JSC.
The letter also discusses specific concerns, for example that the proposed new guidance by the Government on criminal records disclosure will simply have to be reviewed once reform takes place. We ask the Government to publish the Civil Service’s Ban the Box implementation plan, and to commit to undertake research into the costs of unemployment among people with a criminal record, as recommended in the Lammy review. We also raise concerns around clarifications needed in housing allocation guidance.
The full letter is available here.
Learn more about this topic
- Unlock joins calls urging ministers to scrap plans to name and shame people on community sentences
- ‘Unlock the Vote’ for people serving sentences in prison
- Unlock comment: Naming and shaming in the Sentencing Bill
- MoJ’s AI Action Plan for Justice raises questions for people with criminal records
- Unlock stands in support of Mandela Day
Most popular articles from Unlock
- Chance to respond to the DBS customer satisfaction survey
- Decade-old criminal record disclosures? The need for reform
- An update on today’s historic changes to the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974
- Criminal Records Bill receives its first reading in House of Lords
- Why employers need to change! Three short digital stories from people with convictions

Comments
Add Comment