Skip to main content

“I’m not prepared to go through the whole history of what I did years ago.”

After building a successful career, Simon doesn't want a 55-year-old criminal record to become known.

Simon (not his real name) wanted to share his story for two reasons: “because it might help others and because it’s a shout out to the unfairness of the system”.

An unsettled childhood

I am 74, born to Jewish parents and adopted very soon after birth by a couple of Jewish academics who already had one son but could have no more. I think I have always wondered who I was and where I came from.

Despite having a warm, successful and stimulating home, I began to rail against my parents quite early. I was a problem having no connection with the family ‘built in’ so to speak. I did poorly at school, started stealing small items and generally must have been a pain for them. At around 11 or 12 I started stealing bicycles and was caught, of course! But I carried on being a nuisance  and breaking various laws until I was given a warning that Approved School awaited unless I changed my ways.

There followed a period in which I worked at sea but eventually decided to return to land-based employment.  I was 19.  I found a job easily and within a week had stolen the takings from the owner of the business. I was caught and charged, and sent to Borstal – an open one from which I promptly absconded with a new mate.

I was picked up a few weeks later and then sent to a full security place where, to be honest I thrived being one of few young prisoners who could read and write; I helped others with their letters.

Building a new life

I was released early and started the long, hard journey back to normality.

Much of that period is blank actually – I do recall that support was almost non-existent and I dug up vegetables from allotments to eat, I was so hungry. I suppose that too was theft.

I think the system in those days was abysmal and I hope today it’s better and more supportive with probation officers actually interested in their charges.

Many years passed during which I had a lot of legal fun in various parts of the world. Eventually I took a course to become a professional. I ended up in the top 11% on that course and my new career was launched. I followed that profession with great success and later, as a mature student took two post-graduate degrees, a Master’s and a PGCHE. I also become a Fellow of the professional association to which I ascribed.

I became a senior lecturer in my field travelling the world giving lectures, writing numerous articles and a book and I was (and am) well respected in the field.

DBS check for a new job

I managed to avoid being asked for proof of criminal record, even when I took top, senior positions and then, just a few years ago, it happened.

I was offered and accepted a post as an advisor to an organisation which deals with children and so I sent off for my enhanced DBS check which came back with details of my transgressions from all those years ago!

Now, I have a public name and face within my profession and at my age am not prepared to go through the whole history of what I did all those years ago. I declined to show my employer and so, naturally, lost the position.

Unfair and counter-productive

This seems to me to be grossly wrong. That a relatively small theft (£250) can remain on one’s record and determine one’s later employment is simply unfair and counterproductive.

In addition, because my adopted family were WW2 Jewish refugees, I could apply for citizenship of the country from which they escaped. My brother has done so with no problems. I cannot since I’d have to disclose my record!  I feel I am denied a symbolic and important opportunity which would go some way towards putting right the wrongs of Nazism and antisemitism.

I know that I was wrong all those years ago, of course I do, and I don’t blame my actions on anyone but myself. And yet, I believe there is statistical evidence that being adopted can leave one feeling lost and unsettled for a very long time resulting in anti-social behaviours.

I was wrong, yes. But that I am still paying for that error, that slip or series of small slips, is surely not useful to anyone at all.

We can see the back of a person standing at a lectern with a laptop on it. In front of them is an audience of people - the audience is out of focus so they are just colourful blurred shapes.

We want to make sure that our website is as helpful as possible.

Letting us know if you easily found what you were looking for or not enables us to continue to improve our service for you and others.

Was it easy to find what you were looking for?

Thank you for your feedback.

12.5 million people have criminal records in the UK. We need your help to help them.

Help support us now