Skip to main content

Author: Unlock Admin

Blog – Why we’ve launched a website for employers

There’s a talent pool of over 10.5 million people that many companies are overlooking. People with criminal records make good employees. This new website that we’re launching today helps employers to make sure they’re not missing out on the diverse skills and experience of people with criminal records.

With over 750,000 unfilled job vacancies in the UK, it makes business sense to recruit people with convictions. There are many examples of companies that take a positive approach, such as Timpson, Greggs and Virgin Trains. Campaigns like Ban the Box, which calls on employers to remove the tick-box question about criminal records, are having a real impact too. The announcement by David Cameron in February of the civil service banning the box in their recruitment process shows the tide is beginning to turn. There is still stigma surrounding “ex-offenders” that prevents many companies from getting involved, yet two-thirds of employers say that recruiting people with convictions has had a positive impact on their corporate reputation. One aim of this new website is to share good practice and show what positive steps employers are taking to help inspire other companies.

Although nine out of ten employers have said that they’re open to the idea of recruiting people with convictions, in practice less than 20% say they have knowingly done so.  We also know that there is lots of bad practice, and there are legal implications for employers if they get it wrong. For example, taking into account spent convictions can be illegal, and carrying out the wrong level of criminal record check is a criminal offence. That’s why we’ve published a number of examples where we’ve worked with companies to improve their recruitment process, so that other employers can learn from their mistakes.

It’s easy to overlook how complex recruitment processes can be. Criminal record disclosure processes are confusing for applicants and companies alike. Most employers are not experts in rehabilitation legislation, which has had significant changes in recent years – there are many myths out there. We regularly get enquiries from companies that are trying to get their heads around what they can and can’t do. That’s why we’ve produced a range of free, accurate and reliable guidance and tools to help companies develop, adopt and follow inclusive, fair and lawful policies and practices in the recruitment and retention of people with criminal records. We’re basing this work on ten principles of fair chance recruitment that encourage employers to recruit people with convictions and deal with criminal records fairly.

We’re excited about the months ahead. We’re planning to share more examples of good and bad practice, feature more employers, and produce more guidance based on the questions and issues that come to us.

There’s a lot of stigma and discrimination by employers towards people coming out of prison and those with a criminal record, and we know this gets in the way of the so-called ‘rehabilitation revolution’ that the government wants to see. It’s important that people are given education, training and skills, but if there are no employment opportunities at the end of it, it undermines the whole model. This new website comes at this issue from an employers’ perspective, starting from the basis that it’s important to recognise the huge talent pool that they might be overlooking and supporting them to make sure they’re not missing out.

 

This article covers today’s launch of this site and links back to the press release, also published today. Find out more about the launch.

We give evidence to Parliament Committee on support for ex-offenders

Today Unlock, alongside Working Chance, Clinks and Revolving Doors Agency, gave oral evidence to the Work and Pensions Select Committee inquiry into the support for ex-offenders. We were invited to give evidence following our written response to the inquiry.

At the session, Christopher Stacey, Unlock’s co-director, responded to questions focused on employment support, job centre staff and the approach of employers towards people with criminal records.

Watch the evidence session on Parliament TV.

We also supported the Committee by producing and circulating a survey amongst people with convictions. This received 82 responses, all of which were shared with the Committee.

We carried out an analysis of the survey results and submitted it to the Committee.

Download: Results and analysis of our survey

Our response to the Charity Commission’s consultation on power to disqualify from acting as a trustee

We have today published our response to the Charity Commission’s consultation on power to disqualify from acting as a trustee

Background

  1. In May 2016, the Charity Commission launched a consultation on power to disqualify from acting as a trustee.
  2. Download: Submission: Unlock’s response to Charity Commission consultation on power to disqualify from acting as a trustee
  3. More information about our policy work on enabling people with convictions to become trustees and run charities

Appeal against High Court ruling on disproportionate criminal records disclosure scheme scheduled

Since the High Court ruling in January, which found that the current criminal record disclosure scheme for standard/enhanced checks was disproportionate, lots of people have been asking us what would happen next.

We’re now in a position to say that the Government has appealed against the High Court ruling (which to some extent we expected) – this means that the case will go up to the Court of Appeal. The case is being heard with three other cases that involve the ‘type of offence’ exclusion (which is another area we think needs to change).

The case has been listed to be heard in February 2017 with a judgement expected later in the year.

In the meantime, nothing changes. The current DBS filtering system remains in force. If the outcome of the appeal goes the right way from our perspective, the government would need to look at extending the filtering process.

More information

DBS publish independent review into their barring operations

Last week the Disclosure and Barring Service (DBS) published an independent review that has been conducted into their barring operations.

As part of our fair access to employment project, we acted as a stakeholder and fed in our thoughts to the review team.

Although the review has only just been published, the date on the review is November 2015, which seems to reflect when the review was completed. After that point, the DBS appear to have set about responding to the recommendations.

Of particular interest to us was that it was good to see the review recommend that the DBS consider situations where oral representations (instead of just written ones) could be made by those at risk of being barred. This is something that we featured as an update to our information site back in February of this year.

The review also recognised how the letters and factsheets sent out by the DBS are not as effective as they might be in:

  1. encouraging those at risk of barring to participate in the process and to make representations, or
  2. communicating the outcome in a fashion that is both easy to understand and accurate.

The review recommended a ‘mini-review’ and suggested working closely with those who have experience of would be barrees, such as Unlock. The DBS has since done some of this work and we’ve engaged with them to improve the information and communications with those subject to the barring process.

More information

  1. This post relates to our work to improve the way the DBS works as part of ourfair access to employment project.
  2. There’s practical guidance on barring on our information site.

Case studies of bad employer practice that we’ve challenged

We’ve posted a number of anonymous examples of bad practice by employers that we’ve challenged as part of our employment project.

These have been posted to our website for employers, which will be fully launched later this summer, and these case studies will help us to support other employers to not make the same mistakes.

We want to make sure that our website is as helpful as possible.

Letting us know if you easily found what you were looking for or not enables us to continue to improve our service for you and others.

Was it easy to find what you were looking for?

Thank you for your feedback.

12.5 million people have criminal records in the UK. We need your help to help them.

Help support us now