Skip to main content

Unlock Category: 6. Travel

Travelling to the EU and the European Travel Information & Authorisation System (ETIAS)

Settled status: what you need to know if you are an EU citizen and have a criminal record

Introduction

This information is about the EU Settlement Scheme for applicants with a criminal record.

The EU Settlement Scheme protects the rights you currently have in the UK through the process of applying for settled or pre-settled status.

As part of the applications process, there are questions about criminal records and checks are carried out by the Home Office.

It is difficult to give clear information on how the Home Office will treat applications from people with criminal records. We do not know how the Home Office is applying its own guidance so this information cannot tell you categorically what to expect, although the Home Office appears to be taking a very long time to make decisions in many applications from people with criminal records.

The vast majority of applicants with a criminal record should find their criminal record is not a barrier to settled or pre-settled status. That said, you may still be refused settled or pre-settled status because of the suitability criteria.

The key points to know are that:

  1. Having a criminal record should not put you off applying
  2. It’s important to apply as soon as you can. The deadline is 30 June 2021, but you should apply as soon as possible
  3. If you have lived in the UK for five years or more and have no unspent convictions, it is unlikely that your criminal record will be a barrier
  4. If you have unspent convictions, or you have a criminal record and have lived in the UK for less than five years, you should get specialist advice.

Key parts of this information are:

This information goes into more detail on these key points and other areas that people with criminal records and those supporting them should be aware of.

This information is not a detailed guide to settled status. There are links to more general details on settled status in the useful resources.

You can also download a one-page PDF summarising the key information

What type of immigration status does the EU Settlement Scheme grant?

The process of successfully receiving status through the EU Settlement Scheme allows EEA citizens and their family members to continue to live, work and study in the UK after 30 June 2021. Successful applicants will continue to be eligible for:

  1. Public services, such as healthcare and education
  2. Public funds, pensions, access to benefits
  3. British Citizenship if conditions are met

The requirements of settled status are mainly based on UK residence. The Home Office will check how long you have been in the UK and not what you have been doing here. Settled status is not dependent on your employment, whether or not you receive benefits or hold private health insurance.

This means that EU citizens and their family members who have been continually resident in the UK for at least five years should get settled status. The five year residence in the UK does not need to have been in the most recent five years. People who have previously lived in the UK for five years can apply for settled status even if they do not live in the UK anymore, as long as they have not been absent from the UK for more than five consecutive years or have not been deported or excluded.

Those who have lived in the UK for less than five years will have to apply for temporary pre-settled status, which is valid for five years from the date of the decision letter. This will allow them to stay in the UK and apply for settled status once they have achieved five years’ continuous residence in the UK.

Those applying for settled or pre-settled status must also prove their nationality, identity, eligibility and subject themselves to a criminality check (see below).

Do I need to apply to stay in the UK?

If you want to continue to live in the UK, you will need to apply for settled or pre-settled status. You must show that you are from either:

  1. a country in the EU, European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland
  2. another country and you have a family member who is from the EU, EEA or Switzerland

unless you have indefinite leave to remain in/enter the UK or are a British citizen (you hold dual nationality).

The EEA includes EU countries and Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein.

If your application is successful, you will be granted either settled or pre-settled status. With either status, you will be able to continue living and working in the UK after 30 June 2021.

Many people with a criminal record feel nervous about applying and are worried they will be refused.

Will my criminal record affect my application for settled status?

The vast majority of applicants with a criminal record should find that their criminal record is not a barrier to settled or pre-settled status.

If you have not applied for settled or pre-settled status by 30 June 2021, you will not be able to continue living and working in the UK and so you must make an application if you want to continue living in the UK.

If you do not apply before 30 June 2021 then you will become unlawfully resident in the UK which will affect your right to continue living and working here.

Although the Home Office will accept late applications where there is a good reason for missing the deadline, it is important to try to not be in this difficult position and so you should apply as early as possible.

In some situations, where you have unspent convictions or serious offences, it may be necessary to write detailed legal representations in support of your application so that it is not refused or a deportation order is not issued (see more on this below). It is strongly recommended that in these circumstances, you get specialist advice before making your application.

When should I apply?

Your application must be made by 30 June 2021.

Although the deadline is 30 June 2021, you should apply to stay in the UK as soon as possible. After 31 December 2020 you might be asked to prove your right to do things like get a job or use the NHS.

Until 30 June 2021 you can still prove your rights in the UK with your passport or national identity card (if you are an EU, EEA or Swiss citizen), or with your biometric residence document. However, you’ll also be able show you have pre-settled status or settled status as another way of showing your rights.

What questions are asked about criminal records?

If you are over 18, you will be asked the following question as part of your application for settled status:

Have you ever been:
– Convicted of a criminal offence
– Arrested or charged with an offence that you’re on trial for or awaiting trial

This includes offences in the UK or any other country

Children (those under the age of 18) will not be asked this question. However, the Home Office says that all applicants over the age of 10 will be checked against relevant criminal records databases, including the Police National Computer (PNC). This means that in some cases it might be necessary to declare offences even if you are under 18 years old. If you are not sure about this, it is strongly recommended that you get specialist advice before making your application.

How should I answer the question about criminal records?

Home Office guidance states:

You do not need to declare any of the following:
– convictions that do not need to be disclosed (“spent convictions”)
– warnings (“cautions”)
– alternatives to prosecution, for example speeding fines”

Have you got a spent conviction?

Under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, convictions become “spent” in England & Wales after a period of time which is determined by the sentence received.

If you received your conviction in this country and are confident that it is now spent, you do not need to declare it. So long as you have not been arrested and awaiting an outcome of a police investigation, or on trial or awaiting trial, or you can answer “No” to the question.

Although you don’t need to declare spent convictions, for more serious and recent convictions, even if they are now spent, you may want to get specialist advice in support of your application and ask for your application not to be referred for a deportation decision (see more on this below).

Have you got an unspent conviction?

If you received your conviction in this country and it is not yet spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974, you need to answer “Yes” to the first question about your criminal record. You should get specialist advice to support you with your application.

Not sure if your conviction is spent?

You can find out more details about working out if your convictions are spent in England & Wales on this page about spent periods. You can also use our online tool, available at www.disclosurecalculator.org.uk.

If you are not sure if you need to declare a conviction, or if you cannot remember the details, you could:

  1. Apply for your own basic DBS check. This costs £18 and will show any unspent convictions.
  2. Apply for a copy of your police record by making a subject access request. This will show all convictions recorded on the Police National Computer. It won’t separate out unspent and spent convictions and it could also include convictions from overseas as well.

If you are not sure if a conviction is spent, you may decide to declare it. There appears to be no obvious downsides to declaring a spent conviction that didn’t need to be declared.

Overseas conviction?

If your conviction was overseas, the Home Office question suggests that if in that country it would no longer show on your criminal record, you do not have to declare it.

It can be difficult to properly understand the laws on when criminal records no longer show up in the country it was received in, as these laws are different to the way convictions become spent under Rehabilitation of Offenders Act 1974 in England & Wales. There is a comprehensive resource which has country-specific information on overseas criminal record checks and which convictions appear on the certificate issued in that country.

Unless you are confident that your conviction is the equivalent of being spent in the country you received it in, you should declare it.

Not sure?

You might be worried about providing false or misleading information. This should only be a problem if it can be shown that information which wasn’t declared was “material to the decision” – this is likely to mean not declaring serious criminal convictions. However, if you are not sure if your conviction is spent or not, you may choose to err on the side of caution and declare it, given that there appears to be no obvious downsides to declaring a conviction that didn’t need to be declared.

What are the questions if I answer “Yes” to having a criminal record

If you answer “Yes” to the first question, there are then further “Yes/No” questions which, if you need to answer “Yes” to, you will be asked to provide more details. These are:

  1. Have you been convicted of a criminal offence in the UK in the last 12 months?
  2. Have you had a criminal conviction outside the UK that involved any of the following:
    1. a violent offence
    2. a drug-related offence
    3. a prison sentence of 12 months or longer
  3. Have you ever been arrested or charged for an offence for which you are currently on, or awaiting, trial or which is pending a decision to charge?

What checks are done?

Guidance from the Home Office suggests that all applications from those aged 10 or over are checked against databases including the PNC, and this could include revealing spent offences.

Will I be eligible for settled or pre-settled status with my criminal record?

The Home Office say that if you have only been convicted of a minor crime you will still be eligible for settled or pre-settled status.

The Home Office has not published details on how they define “a minor crime” and so it is difficult to give any definitive information. However, we know a number of cases where people who had lived in the UK for more than five years, then been convicted in the last five years, received prison sentences of less than a couple of years and have since been granted settled status.

However, as covered below, if a crime leads to a prison sentence that is served over 30 June 2021, and if you have less than five years continuous residence, you cannot meet the eligibility to be granted pre-settled status as you will not have begun a continuous qualifying period before the specified date.

Will my application be referred to Immigration Enforcement?

Your application will be received by a casework team. From information provided on the application form and the information obtained from the PNC, if your criminal record requires assessment, your application will be paused and moved to a different team for a case-by-case consideration.

According to Home Office guidance, applications will be moved in this way if:

  • In the last five years you have received a conviction which resulted in a prison sentence
  • You have ever received a conviction which resulted in a prison sentence of 12 months or more as a result of a single offence.
  • In the last three years, you have received three or more convictions (including non-custodial sentences) unless you have lived in the UK for five years or more. This category would include persistent offending. ‘Persistent’ offending is where a person has a number of convictions for minor offences or non-custodial sentences, suspended sentences, restraining orders, Anti-social Behaviour Orders or police cautions. Whether an applicant will be classed as a persistent offender really depends on the facts of the individual case, taking into account the nature and frequency of the offences. The passage of time since the individual’s last offence will be a factor for consideration but will not, in itself, be determinative.
  • You are currently in prison and your case is awaiting deportation consideration.

If you have a criminal record that is not covered by the above, it is unlikely that your application will be referred as a result of your criminal record.

Your application won’t be referred if:

  1. A recorded decision has previously been made not to pursue deportation
  2. A previous decision to deport was overturned on appeal
  3. You received a prison sentence and at the time you were in prison, your conviction did not meet the criteria for referral (see below)

All three situations above are based on you having not committed any further offences that meet the above criteria.

You might not be told that your application has been referred, but if it has then it is likely to take much longer than other applications.

What happens if my application is referred?

If you make an application for settled status and your criminal record means that you might meet the criteria for deportation, no decision will be reached on your application until your case has been referred to Immigration Enforcement and a decision made on whether to pursue deportation on the facts of the case.

This means:

  • Your settled status application will be put on hold, potentially for a long time, while you are considered for deportation
  • It is not clear that you will be informed that this is happening
  • The Home Office might be in touch by telephone or writing to ask for further information, and you may be required to attend an interview
  • It is only if you are served with a deportation decision that your application for settled status will be refused due to a criminal record. If a deportation decision is made and the settled status application is refused, it is not clear whether the Home Office will attempt to detain you

Will a previous prison sentence lead to a referral?

As long as you have not committed a further offence that meets the referral criteria, your application won’t be referred if you have received a prison sentence and, at the time you were in prison, your conviction did not meet the criteria for referral to the Home Office for deportation.

The Home Office publishes criteria in the ‘Referral to Immigration Enforcement’ section of the suitability guidance. The key points are:

  • Prison sentences of up to two years in length received before 1 April 2009 do not lead to a referral
  • Prison sentences from before 6 October 2015, where the prison sentence is still being served, will be referred
  • If your prison sentence was before 6 October 2015 and you have been released, you have not been deported and so can apply
  • If your prison sentence was after 6 October 2015, this leads to consideration for deportation. If you are (or have been) released then you have already been referred/considered and not deported. If you are still serving a sentence then you will be referred (even if for a very short sentence)

Overseas convictions

The section above on answering the questions asked covers whether you need to declare overseas convictions.

The Home Office will look to get details of overseas convictions where these are declared by you, or where the check of the PNC indicates that information exists. This may involve them contacting you for more information or carrying out an overseas criminal record check (this will only be required where the Home Office deem it essential).

An overseas check will not normally be done where you have five years’ continuous residence in the UK and there is no evidence of offending from the PNC.

What will the outcome of my application be?

Criminal records received before 31 December 2020

Criminal records that relate to offences committed before 31 December 2020 are considered on different criteria to criminal records for offences after this date.

Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC sets out the EU public policy tests for deportation (the underlined text is the overarching test):

“Previous criminal convictions shall not in themselves constitute grounds for taking such measures. The personal conduct of the individual concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficient serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society. Justifications that are isolated from the particulars of the case or that rely on considerations of general prevention shall not be accepted.”

For offences up to 31 December 2020, the threshold for deportation is a high one, especially for:

  1. Those who have acquired permanent residence (‘serious grounds of public policy and public security’)
  2. Those continuously resident for ten years or more (‘imperative grounds of public security’)
  3. Children (‘imperative grounds of public security’).

The assessment is based on current EU law. The question will be whether you pose a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat. This will be assessed proportionally taking into account all facts of your situation. Your application might be refused if:

  • You have, in the last five years, received a conviction which resulted in a prison sentence.
  • You have, at any time, received a conviction which resulted in a prison sentence of 12 months or more as a result of a single offence (this this does not include consecutive sentences).
  • You have, in the last 3 years, received three or more convictions (including non-custodial sentences) unless you have lived in the UK for five years or more.

Immigration Enforcement also take into account factors such as age, health, family relationships, social and cultural integration etc.

You should only be refused settled or pre-settled status on the basis of ‘serious grounds of public policy or public security’, which is the term that is used to set out what types of cases that can lead to a refusal (this is known as the EU public policy/public security/public health test, as set out in the EEA Regulations 2016)

Criminal records received after 31 December 2020

The Government is keen to impose UK-law thresholds in relation to offences from 1 January 2021 and Appendix EU will apply a lower ‘conducive to the public good’ test to offences that occur after that date.

If you are an EU citizen eligible to apply for (or have) settled status, the tougher UK criminality thresholds will apply to offences committed after 31 December 2020.

  1. There is a presumption of automatic deportation for any offence resulting in prison sentence of 12 months or more, subject to human rights considerations
  2. For prison sentences of less than 12 months and other convictions, there is no automatic deportation but you will be deported if it is deemed “conducive to the public good”.

Convictions obtained from 1 January 2021 will be covered in more detail in an updated version of our information on deportation. The Immigration Bill continues its passage through Parliament and will provide the legal basis for ending freedom of movement on 31 December 2020. The government has said it will confirm the final details for the points-based system in late 2020 and that “a robust and consistent approach to applying the UK criminality thresholds for the refusal of entry, permission to remain in the UK, deportation and exclusion, to EU and non-EU citizens, will be taken.”

Continuous residence and prison sentences

To be granted settled status, you will usually need to have been living in the UK continuously for five years, known as ‘continuous residence’.

If you have been to prison, you will usually need at least five years’ continuous residence from the day you were released to be considered for settled status, unless you had previously had five years’ continuous residence before the prison sentence.

There are three key parts to this.

If you have lived in the UK for five years, you can rely on this to apply for settled status, unless since you completed the five years a ‘supervening event’ has occurred, which includes a deportation or removal decision.

If you have lived in the UK for five years and then served a prison sentence but have not been subject to a deportation decision, you can apply for settled status with five years’ continuous residence. Evidencing your five years’ residence is crucial in establishing a right to settled status.

If you have lived in the UK for under five years and would be in line for pre-settled status, a prison sentence of any length has the effect of resetting the clock on your continuity of residence in the UK. The period of imprisonment does not count towards residence and you start to accrue residence again from scratch upon release. This means that you might have lived in the UK for four and a half years and be sentenced to six months in prison and upon release before 31 December 2020 the four and a half years would count for nothing and your period of residence would have to restart from scratch.

  • Example 1 – Mr A has lived in the UK for 8 years. He was sentenced to 6 weeks in prison last year. Mr A has 5 years’ continuous residence to apply for settled status because he had lived in the UK for more than 5 years before his prison sentence.
  • Example 2 – Mr B has lived in the UK for 4 years. He was sentenced to 8 weeks in prison 2 years ago. Mr B has only 2 years’ continuous residence because his continuity of residence was broken by his prison sentence and only the time since his release counts towards his continuous residence. Mr B is not eligible for settled status so would be eligible for pre-settled status.

What if I’m refused?

If the decision is to deport or exclude you due to your criminal record, then your settled status application will be refused. This will mean you will have an accompanying deportation or removal order which is the decision that will need to be appealed. If the deportation order is successfully appealed, you will then be able to resubmit your settled status application.

For applications made on or after 31 January 2020, you have a right of appeal against a refusal on eligibility or suitability grounds. You have 14 days, if you are inside the UK, to appeal the decision to an independent immigration judge. If you are outside the UK, you have 28 days to appeal the decision.

For applications made before 31 January 2020 there is no right of appeal.

If the Home Office decides to issue deportation proceedings against you, or if your settled or pre-settled status is revoked as a result of a deportation decision, you will have a chance to challenge these decisions by submitting representations and lodging an appeal to the First-Tier Tribunal. This appeal must be lodged under the EEA Regulations 2016 if the deportation decision is based on criminal conduct that took place before 31/12/2020 or under the UK domestic immigration rules if the criminal conduct took place after 31/12/2020,

If your application was refused on eligibility grounds, you can make an application for an administrative review, if you think that the caseworker incorrectly applied the law in your case. Unlike an appeal, administrative review is not a reconsideration of your case. You have 28 days to make an application for an administrative review (seven days for those in detention). There is no discretion to allow late applications.

If you are currently in prison

How to apply

If you are currently in prison, you will probably need to use a paper application form given the difficulties in accessing your own identity documents and using a smart phone (which rules out using the app). Contact the Settlement Resolution Centre (0300 123 7379) to request that a paper application is sent to you. If you have problems contacting the Settlement Resolution Centre, somebody else can request a paper application on your behalf. They will be asked why you can’t apply online, which country you are from, whether you are an EEA citizen or the family member of a qualifying citizen, and whether you have ID. Unlock’s helpline can contact the Settlement Resolution Centre on your behalf to request a paper application form.

Ask the prison to provide your identity document to the Home Office when your application is sent (we understand that prison governors will make ID documents accessible).

It is possible for a third party to complete the online application on your behalf.

If you have lived in the UK for five years before you went to prison and are released from prison after 30 June 2021 and didn’t apply while in prison, you might be able to make a late application.  You would have to show that a short prison sentence over the cut-off date was a good reason for a late application. It is, however, advisable to make the application before 30 June 2021 to avoid having to argue that discretion should be exercised in accepting your application after the cut-off date.

If you have lived in the UK for less than five years, and are sent to prison before 31 December 2020 and are due to be released from 1 January 2021, if you apply for settled status you will be refused on eligibility grounds because your continuous qualifying residence cannot begin until after 31 December 2020.

Making representations

If the Home Office seek to issue a deportation decision against you, you will have the opportunity to make representations to the Home Office against making a deportation order.

These representations should cover details of your life in the UK before the prison sentence, and be focused on two parts:

  1. Showing that you have been working, in self-employment, running a business, studying etc
  2. Confirming and providing evidence of factors that Immigration Enforcement take into account (such as age, health, family relationships, social and cultural integration).

You should get specialist advice in making representations.

Arrested, charged or awaiting trial?

This is something you are asked about when you first apply.

If this applies to you, or if you are later arrested and/or charged, your application will likely be frozen while legal proceedings are still ongoing, and you will be asked to notify the Resolution Centre of the outcome. This can mean that your application will take a significant amount of time before a decision is reached.

If you are a child when you apply

Your application must be considered in line with children’s rights standards but these are not clearly explained by Home Office guidance.

Under the Immigration (European Economic Area Regulations) 2016, a child under the age of 18 cannot be deported except on ‘imperative grounds of public security’. The ‘imperative grounds of public security’ wording is also found in Article 20 of the Withdrawal Agreement and both mirror Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38 (Articles 27-33). This is an extremely high threshold.

If you apply after you turn 18 you are treated as an adult. However, if you apply before you turn 18 and subsequently turn 18, your application will be considered based on the age you were on the date of application. In general, deportation action is more likely to take place once a young person has turned 18. It is unclear whether or not the Home Office takes into account your age at the point at which an offence occurred.

Applications from your children

If your child (while under the age of 18) has lived in the UK for five years as a family member before you as an EEA parent serves a prison sentence, your child can apply for settled status without the prison sentence having an impact. However, for pre-settled status, the Home Office considers that your child’s continuous residence would be broken along with yours by the prison sentence.

Your child may have rights from their other parent, in which case your prison sentence should not affect your child’s rights.

Getting specialist immigration advice

Organisations providing immigration advice related to the EU Settlement Scheme are registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner. There are different levels of advisor. Level 1 advisors can provide initial advice and so can help with applications where convictions do not need to be declared. However, where convictions need to be declared, these applications will be referred to a higher-level provider. Level 2 advisors can provide casework, and level 3 advisors can provide advocacy and representation.

If you have unspent convictions, or you have a criminal record and have lived in the UK for less than five years, you should get specialist advice. You should get advice from an organisation that can provide advice about convictions that need to be declared (these would be level 2 and level 3 advisors)

Organisations that are known to be able to offer advice and casework support (for people making settled status applications with criminal convictions that need to be declared) include:

  • AIRE (Advice on Individual Rights in Europe) CentreThe AIRE Centre offer telephone and online support to victims of abuse and trafficking, homeless people, children in care, Roma people, individuals in atypical and vulnerable living situations and complex cases
  • Coram Children’s Legal CentreCoram Children’s Legal Centre offers support to children and young people on the EU settlement scheme and criminal convictions. This support is normally limited to email advice, but legal representation may be provided in a small number of cases where legal aid is available (e.g. separated children)
  • Here for Good LawHere for Good provides free immigration advice to EEA nationals and their family members living in the UK, through an email and telephone advice line.
  • Rights of WomenRights of Women have an EU settlement scheme advice line for women who are themselves an EU citizen (including EEA and Swiss) or are the family member of an EU citizen and need advice on their immigration status. This line is only for women who have experienced Violence Against Women and Girls (including domestic abuse, sexual violence, trafficking, modern slavery, so-called honour-based violence and FGM).

A number of organisations are being funded to provide support to vulnerable and at risk EU citizens applying to the EU Settlement Scheme.

The website eurights.uk provides information for EU citizens and their family members concerned about their EU rights, their rights after Brexit and what they need to do to stay in the UK.

You can also use the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC) Adviser Finder to find a registered adviser near you.

Useful resources

General information on settled status

  1. Gov.uk information on the EU Settlement Scheme
  2. Citizens Advice information on staying in the UK if you’re from the EU
  3. Publications Office of the European Union – Brexit – What you need to know as an EU citizen living in the UK (available in multiple languages)

Technical resources

  1. The limited basis under which settled or pre-settled status can be restricted on ‘conduct’ grounds (including criminality) are set out in Article 20 of the Withdrawal Agreement
  2. The EU Settlement Scheme: suitability requirements sets out the relevance of a criminal record
  3. Chapter VI of Directive 2004/38/EC sets out the EU public policy tests for deportation
  4. Current EU public policy/public security/public health test, as set out in the Immigration (European Economic Area) Regulations 2016 (EEA Regulations)

About this information

This information provides general details about the EU Settlement Scheme and applying for settled status. This information does not relate to individual cases. The provision of immigration advice and services is a regulated activity and can only be performed by qualified persons i.e. those regulated by the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner or solicitors and barristers in England and Wales regulated by the Solicitor’s Regulatory Authority (SRA) and the Bar Standards Board (BSB) respectively.

Unlock’s staff are not registered immigration advisors so we are unable to provide immigration advice. This means we are unable to provide an opinion on a course of action or a range of options a person might take based on the information the individual has provided. However, as a charity we are keen to understand the specific issues that people with criminal records are facing in relation to applying for settled status, and to make sure that the information we provide is as clear and helpful as possible, so we encourage those supporting applicants to get in touch on that basis. You can email feedback@unlock.org.uk.

About Unlock

Unlock is a national independent advocacy charity for people facing obstacles, stigma and discrimination because of their criminal record.

We have been working to help secure the rights of EU nationals to settled status in the UK by ensuring that a criminal record does not unfairly exclude them. More information about this work can be found here.

More information

  1. For practical information – We have more information on EU nationals coming to and staying in the UK as part of our information section on coming to (and staying in) the UK.
  2. To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experiences on the “Staying the UK” section on our online forum
  3. Our policy work – Read about the policy work we’re doing on settled status.
  4. Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information.  You can:

  1. Comment on this page (below)
  2. Send your feedback directly to us
  3. Discuss your views and experiences with others in the “Staying the UK” section on our online forum
  4. Share your personal story by contributing to our online magazine, theRecord
  5. Help our policy work – we want to hear from people who have had challenges in getting settled status because of their criminal record. Find out more here

This page was last fully reviewed and updated in October 2020. If you’ve spotted something that needs updating, please let us know by emailing the details to advice@unlock.org.uk or completing a feedback form.

Please note: This information is quite new. Let us know what you think of it and how it could be improved. Leave your feedback. We will be updating it more as time goes by. To be notified of updates, sign up to our mailing list.

Travelling to Russia

Aim of this page

Russia may not be high on everyone’s list of holiday destinations but it’s a country that has opened up tremendously over the last few years and is now seen by many as a fascinating country to visit.

The aim of this page is to provide details of the documentation needed to travel to Russia and whether it’s necessary to disclose details of your criminal record. It’s part of our information on travelling abroad.

Why is this important?

The majority of people visiting Russia will need to get a visa before they travel and the visa process can be quite strict. When making an application you should make sure that the visa type you’re applying for is consistent with the purpose of your visit and that all the information contained in the visa document is correct.

It’s important that you’re aware of any conditions attached to your visa and that you strictly adhere to these. Overstaying your visa or breaching the visa conditions can result in fines, court hearings, deportation or possibly a ban from re-entry.

Do you need a visa to enter Russia?

Most foreign nationals will need to have an entry visa to travel to Russia. If you are transiting through Russia but won’t be leaving the airport then you won’t need a visa.

There are many types of visa available but a tourist or business visa will usually be suitable for most travellers. You’ll need to make the initial application online but will then need to visit a Visa Application Centre to submit your biometric data; these are located in London, Manchester and Edinburgh.

Applying for a visa

Your visa application will need to be made online. If you are based in the UK and aged 12 or over you’ll also need to visit a Visa Application Centre to submit your biometric data (scanned fingerprints).

What questions are asked about criminal records on the visa application form?

There are several questions on the application form relating to war crimes, crimes against humanity and membership of recognised terrorist organisations.

There is one question which specifically asks about your criminal record, namely:

Have you ever been charged with a criminal or administrative offence (including traffic violation) in Russia or any other country?  Yes/No”

The question only allows you to give a ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ answer; it does not ask you to provide specific details about your criminal record.

On submitting your online form, you’ll be provided with a list of documents that you’ll need to take to the Visa Application Centre. It’s likely that under the ‘Additional Documents’ you’ll be asked to provide further evidence of your criminal record.

How does the visa process work?

  1. Once you’ve completed and submitted your online visa application form, print it off and sign it.
  2. You’ll receive a ‘next steps’ email which will provide you with details of what documents you need to take to the Application Centre (see below).
  3. The Application Centre will contact you to confirm a suitable day and time to provide your biometric data and any other information. This can take up to 1 hour depending on the number of applicants being seen.
  4. In some cases (for example where you’ve disclosed a criminal record) you will be invited for an interview to discuss your application further.

What documents will you need?

When you visit the Visa Application Centre, you’ll need to take the following documents with you:

You’ll need to print off and sign the completed online application form.

Your passport must be valid for at least 6 months after the planned date of departure from Russia and you must have a blank visa page if you’re applying for a single-entry visa or two blank pages for a double-entry visa.

One passport sized photograph which is no older than 6 months.

The tourist voucher is a document that confirms your itinerary, hotel you are staying in and any excursions whilst you are in Russia. It will also include a tourist reference number. The confirmation of invitation is typically issued by a licensed UK or Russian travel company. The voucher and confirmation of invitation must have the same reference number.

An official document issued by a company that has been licensed by the Russian Ministry of Internal Affairs.

These may include any additional documents such as those for nationals or people applying outside their home country, children travelling alone, auto-tourist visas and documents that are required for self or unemployed travellers.

What happens if you’re invited to an interview?

In some cases the consulate may wish to interview you before making a decision about your visa. The purpose of the interview is usually to gather further information about you and your trip.

Will your application be successful?

Most people who apply for a Russian visa don’t have any problems in obtaining one. However, if you are denied a visa, the consular authorities generally won’t inform you of the reason for the rejection, citing national security reasons. On top of not giving you any explanation, they will not refund your application fee.

Refusals are generally related to the documentation you have submitted or the characteristics of the applicant. Issues with documentation can usually be solved easily by providing missing data or correcting anything that’s wrong.

If you have answered ‘Yes’ to the question relating to criminal records your application may be refused on the basis that ‘The applicant is considered a danger to the Russian authorities’.

There is very little information available which sets out the details of the types of offence or sentence/disposal that would lead to an application being refused. However, it does seem that the majority of visas are approved and only declined in exceptional cases.

Discuss this with others

Read and share your experiences on our online forum.

Key sections include:

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page. More specific details (including addresses and telephone numbers) of some of the organisations listed below can be found here.

More information

  1. For practical information – More information can be found in our travelling abroad section
  2. To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
  3. Question – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can:

  1. Comment on this page (below)
  2. Send your feedback directly to us.
  3. Discuss your views and experiences with others on our online forum.
  4. Share your personal story by contributing to our online magazine, theRecord.

Identifying whether your offence is a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT)

This is a short information page about moral turpitude.

The aim of this page is to set out a list of UK offences and highlight those which would not be deemed to be a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT) and which would therefore enable you to travel to the USA using the Visa Waiver Programme (ESTA).

Introduction

Moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States and, although there is no set statutory definition, crimes involving moral turpitude (CIMT) have been identified in the US as those that involve conduct that is shocking to the public conscience; vile or depraved or contrary to the rules, morality, and duties of society.

This is important because, if your offence is a CIMT, you will normally have to apply for a visa before you can travel to the US.

This is part of our information on travelling to the US, and in particular the section on ‘Do I need a visa?‘.

Is my offence a crime involving moral turpitude?

From the information available from the US Embassy, it can be difficult to match a UK offence with a US equivalent and therefore not always easy to establish whether your offence would be deemed to be a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (CIMT). To help you identify whether your offence is a CIMT (or not), we’ve put together a list of the 80 most common UK offences.

Using the table

The table below sets out a list of the 80 most common UK offences in alphabetical order. Those marked ‘Yes’ would, in our opinion, be deemed to be a crime involving moral turpitude.

Where we don’t feel that an offence is a CIMT, we’ve set out our reasons for reaching that decision.

If your offence is not a CIMT then, you can travel to the US for tourism or business stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa; you would be able to travel using the Visa Waiver Programme (ESTA).

OffenceIs a crime involving moral turpitudeWhy
AbductionYes
AffrayThe offence is NOT a CIMT if you are able to demonstrate that there was no intent to harm persons or things.
Arson & attempted arsonYes
Assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH)If you are able to demonstrate that there was no intent to cause ABH then the offence is NOT a CIMT.
If the ABH was an act of domestic violence then it IS a CIMT.
Assault occasioning grievous bodily harm (GBH)If you are able to demonstrate that there was no intent to cause GBH then the offence is NOT a CIMT.
If the GBH was an act of domestic violence then it IS a CIMT.
Assaulting a police constableThe offence is NOT a CIMT if it did not result in bodily injury or if the offence was not wilful.
Assisting an offenderYes
BatteryThe offence is NOT a CIMT if you are able to demonstrate that there was no evil intent or depraved motive.
Benefit fraudYes
BlackmailYes
BigamyYes
Breach of the peaceCrimes of regulatory character such as this one are NOT a CIMT.
Brothel-keepingYes
BuggeryThe UK Parliament repealed buggery laws in England and Wales in 1967.
BurglaryYes
Carrying out regulated activity without being registeredOn its own it's unlikely to be a CIMT. However, it's likely to be linked to a charge of 'making false representation' which IS a CIMT.
Causing/inciting a child to engage in sexual activityYes
Child neglectYes
Common assaultCommon assault is the equivalent of the US simple assault. If there is no evil intent nor the use of a dangerous weapon, it is NOT a CIMT.
Conspiracy to commit murderYes
Conspiracy to defraudYes
Contempt of courtSince contempt of court is not usually motivated by vile intent, it is NOT a CIMT.
Criminal damageThe offence is NOT a CIMT if the damage was to private property. For all other criminal damage offences, it IS a CIMT.
Cruelty to animalsThere is no mention of this offence in the list of crimes included in the definition of moral turpitude.
Cruelty to childrenYes
Death by dangerous drivingYes
Downloading indecent images of childrenYes
Driving a motor vehicle whilst under the influence of drink or drugsThe offence in itself, without any aggrevating factors, is NOT a CIMT.
Driving without due care and attentionThe offence, if not carried out with an evil intent, is NOT a CIMT.
Drunk and disorderlyCrimes or regulatory character such as this are NOT a CIMT.
Failing to notify a change of circumstancesYesUsually linked to benefit fraud and IS a CIMT.
Failing to provide a specimenThis offence is not serious enough and therefore is NOT a CIMT.
Failing to stop after an accidentSince the offence is not usually motivated by a vile intent, it is NOT a CIMT.
False accountingYes
Fly-tippingDumping waste is NOT a CIMT.
ForgeryYes
Fraud by abuse of positionYes
Going equipped for theft
Handling stolen goodsIf you are in possession of property which you have no knowledge is stolen, then this is NOT a CIMT. If your are aware, then it IS a CIMT.
HarassmentWould NOT be a CIMT unless it was racially aggravated.
HijackingYes
Human traffickingYes
ImportationYes
Indecent assaultYes
Indecent exposureYes
KidnappingKidnapping is NOT a CIMT.
Aggravated kidnapping IS a CIMT.
Malicious woundingYes
Making false representationYes
Making or possessig explosivesIf there was no intent to cause harm it would NOT be a CIMT.
ManslaughterYes
MurderYes
Obtaining property by deceptionYes
Outraging public decencyYes
Possession of a controlled drugSimply possessing or using a controlled substance is NOT a CIMT.
Possession of class A, B or C drugsIf you were in possession of class A,B or C drugs, this is NOT a CIMT. If you had the intention of distributing them, then it IS a CIMT.
Possession of a firearmPossession of a firearm without any aggravating factors (such as illicit trafficking in firearms, or transferring of a firearm knowing that it will be suse to commit a crime) is NOT a CIMT.
Pessession of indecent images of childrenYes
Possessing, making and distributing indecent images of childrenYes
ProstitutionYes
Racially or religiously aggravated assaultYes
RapeYes
Receiving stolen goodsIf you are in possession of propery which you have no knowledge is stolen then this is NOT a CIMT. If you are aware, then it IS a CIMT.
Resisting arrestThe offence, if it was not conducted with inherently vile motives, is NOT a CIMT.
RobberyYes
Sexual assaultYes
ShopliftingYes
SolicitingYes
StalkingYes
Taking a motor vehicle without consentYes
Theft by employeeYes
Theft from dwellingYes
Theft from non-dwellingYes
Threatening behaviourIf you have been convicted of threatening behaviour (under Section 4 of the Public Order Act) this is NOT a CIMT.
Threats to killYes
Travelling on a railway without paying a fareIf you have received a FPN then this is NOT a CIMT. If you have been prosecuted in court then this would be dealt with as fraud and IS a CIMT.
TrespassSimply trespassing is NOT a CIMT.
Supplied of a controlled drugYes
Supply of class A, B or C drugYes
Using threatening, abusive, insulting words or behaviour with intent to cause fear
Violent disorder
VoyeurismYes
Wasting police time

* The mere possession of a controlled substance is not sufficient for it to be deemed a Crime Involving Moral Turpitude (INA 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(I)). However, answering ‘Yes’ to the question on the ESTA form which asks ‘Have you ever violated any law related to possessing, using or distributing illegal drugs‘ would make you ineligible to travel under the Visa Waiver Programme.

Useful links

Below you will find links to other useful information relating to travelling to the USA.

More information

  1. For practical information – More information can be found on our travelling to the US section
  2. To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
  3. Questions –  If you have any questions about this you can contact our helpline.

As this page is new, we’re keen to get your thoughts. Let us know what you think of it and how it could be improved by emailing us at feedback@unlock.org.uk or completing our feedback form.

Travelling to India

This is a short information page about travelling to India. The aim of this page is to provide further information about the e-Visa system which was introduced in April 2017.

It forms part of our information section on travelling abroad.

Background

On 1 April 2017 the Indian visa waiver scheme was renamed e-Visa and introduced three subcategories of e-Visa:

  1. e-Tourist Visa
  2. e-Business Visa
  3. e-Medical Visa

This information will concentrate on the e-Tourist Visa.

Eligibility for an e-Visa

International travellers can apply for an e-Visa if their reason for visiting India is for recreation, visiting friends or relatives, short duration medical treatment or casual business visits. Travellers will need:

  • A passport with at least 6 months validity from the date of arrival in India. The passport should have at least two blank pages for stamping by Immigration Officers.
  • A return ticket or onward journey ticket, with sufficient money to spend during your stay in India.

Applying for the e-Visa

An application for an e-Visa must be made at least four calendar days prior to arrival in India although it can be made up to 120 days in advance. The only way to apply for an e-Visa is using the online application form; there are no hard copies of the form available.

You’ll need to provide details of a sponsor such as a travel agent or hotel to establish your address whilst in India.

You will have to upload a recent passport sized photograph and a scan of the information page of your passport.

Questions about your criminal record

The online form asks you to tick ‘Yes’ or ‘No’ to the following questions relating to criminal convictions:

  1. Have you ever been arrested / prosecuted / convicted by Court of Law of any country?
  2. Have you ever been engaged in human trafficking / drug trafficking / child abuse / crimes against women / economic offence / financial fraud?
  3. Have you ever been engaged in cyber crime / terrorist activities / sabotage / espionage / genocide / political killing / other acts of violence?
  4. Have you ever by any means or medium expressed views that justify or glorify terrorist violence or that may encourage others to terrorist acts or other serious criminal acts.

If you answer ‘Yes’ to any of the questions you will be asked to provide further details.

More information

  1. To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experience on our online forum
  2. Questions – If you have any questions about this you can contact our helpline.

Deportation due to a criminal record

We are unable to give immigration advice as under UK immigration law, organisations can only provide this if they are registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC). Details of specialist immigration organisations can be found on our important links and organisations page.

 

Aim of this page

The aim of this page is to set out the process by which someone may be deported from the UK if convicted of a criminal offence, and what actions you can take to appeal a deportation decision.

This information is part of our section on coming to (and staying in) the UK.

Why is this important?

If you’re threatened with deportation, it’s important to have an understanding of the legality of any deportation order, whether it’s possible to appeal a deportation decision and what you would need to address in any representation to the courts.

Introduction

Deportation is a statutory power given to the Home Secretary. Under section 3(5) of the Immigration Act 1971, a person who is not a British citizen (referred to here as ‘a foreign national’) is liable to be deported from the UK if the Home Secretary deems it to be ‘conducive to the public good’.

If you’re made subject to a deportation order then you’ll be required to leave the UK. The order will authorise your detention until such a time as you are deported. It will also prohibit you from re-entering the country for as long as it is in force and will invalidate any leave to enter or remain in the UK given to you before the order was made.

Automatic deportation due to a criminal record

The UK Borders Act 2007 (s32) allows for the automatic deportation of ‘foreign criminals’.

(1)  A ‘foreign criminal’ is defined in the Act as a person:

  • who is not a British citizen
  • who is convicted* in the United Kingdom of an offence, and
  • to whom Condition 1 and 2 below applies

(2)  Condition 1 is that the person is sentenced to a period of imprisonment of 12 months or more.

(3)  Condition 2 is that:

  • The offence is specified by order of the Secretary of State under section 72(4)(a) of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 (c.41) (serious criminal), and
  • The person is sentenced to a period of imprisonment.

*’Convicted’ does not include somebody deemed not guilty of an offence by reason of insanity and who are then made the subject of an order under section 5 of the Criminal Procedure (Insanity) Act 1964.

What is meant by “a period of imprisonment”?

The period of imprisonment referred to in Condition 1 applies to:

  • The sentence imposed by the court rather than the period of time actually served in prison
  • Those sentenced to imprisonment or detention for an indeterminate period of time
  • Those sentenced to at least 12 months detention in an institution other than a prison (for example a hospital or young offenders institution.

It does not apply to:

  • Anybody who has received a suspended sentence
  • Consecutive sentences amounting to more than 12 months
  • Imprisonment due to the default of payment of compensation or a fine.

What is meant by “a serious crime”?

We’ve listed below some of the more common offences that would be considered “a serious crime”. A full list can be found under the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002:

  • Section 29(1)(a) (maliciously wounding or causing grievous bodily harm so as to constitute an offence under section 20 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 that is racially or religiously aggravated).
  • Section 29(1)(b) (causing actual bodily harm so as to constitute an offence under section 47 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861 that is racially or religiously aggravated).
  • Section 29(1)(c) (committing a common assault that is racially or religiously aggravated).
  • Section 31(1)(a) (committing an offence under section 4(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 that is racially or religiously aggravated).
  • Section 31(1)(b) (committing an offence under section 4A(1) of the Public Order Act 1986 that is racially or religiously aggravated).

  • Section 1(1) (intending to commit an offence and doing an act that is more than merely preparatory to the commission of that offence, provided that the offence in question is described in Schedule 1 to this Order or this Schedule).

  • Section 1(1) (destroying or damaging, without lawful excuse, another’s property intending to destroy or damage it or being reckless as to that).
  • Section 1(2) (destroying or damaging, without lawful excuse, property, intending, or being reckless as to whether, that destruction or damage would result and intending that damage or destruction to endanger the life of another or being reckless as to that).
  • Section 2 (threatening, without lawful excuse, to destroy or damage property, knowing that such a threat is likely to endanger another’s life).
  • Section 3(a) (having in custody or under control anything intending, without lawful excuse, to use, or permit use of, it to destroy or damage another’s property).
  • Section 3(b) (having in custody or under control anything, intending without lawful excuse, to use, or permit use of, it to destroy or damage property knowing that such an act is likely to endanger another’s life).

  • Section 1 (agreeing to pursue a course of conduct which, if carried out as intended, necessarily amounts to the commission of an offence or would do so but for the fact that such commission is impossible, provided that the offence in question is an offence described in Schedule 1 to this Order or this Schedule).
  • Section 51(1) (placing or dispatching an article, intending to induce a belief that it will explode or ignite and cause personal injury or property damage).
  • Section 51(2) (communicating information, knowing or believing it to be false intending to induce a belief that a bomb or other thing is liable to explode in a place).

  • Section 134(1) (intentionally inflicting severe pain or suffering on another, where the offender is a public official or person acting in an official capacity who does such acts in performance, or purported performance, of his official duties).
  • Section 134(2) (intentionally inflicting severe pain or suffering on another at the instigation, consent or acquiescence of a public official, or person acting in an official capacity who at the time of such investigation, consent or acquiescence is acting in performance, or purported performance, of his official duties).

  • Section 4(3)(a) (supplying or offering to supply a controlled drug, where the offence in question is in respect of a Class A drug or Class B drug controlled by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971).
  • Section 4(3)(b) (being concerned in the supply of a controlled drug, where the offence in question is in respect of a Class A drug or Class B drug controlled by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971).
  • Section 4(3)(c) (being concerned in the making of an offer to supply a controlled drug, where the offence in question is in respect of a Class A drug or Class B drug controlled by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971).
  • Section 5(3) (possessing a controlled drug intending to supply it to another, where the offence in question is in respect of a Class A drug or Class B drug controlled by the Misuse of Drugs Act 1971).
  • Section 8(a) (occupying or managing premises where the production or attempted production of a controlled drug is knowingly permitted on those premises).
  • Section 8(b) (occupying or managing premises where the supply, or attempted supply, of or the offer to supply a controlled drug is knowingly permitted on those premises).
  • Section 9(a) (smoking or otherwise using opium).
  • Section 9(b) (frequenting a place used for opium smoking).
  • Section 9(c)(i) (possessing pipes or utensils for use in connection with opium smoking which have been used, permitted or intended for use, for that purpose).
  • Section 9(c)(ii) (possessing utensils for use in connection with preparing opium for smoking which have been used, permitted or intended for use for that purpose).
  • Section 20 (assisting or inducing, while in the United Kingdom, the commission of an offence under corresponding law outside the United Kingdom).

  • Section 327(1)(a) (concealing criminal property).
  • Section 327(1)(b) (disguising criminal property).
  • Section 327(1)(c) (converting criminal property).
  • Section 327(1)(d) (transferring criminal property).
  • Section 327(1)(e) (removing criminal property from England and Wales, Scotland or Northern Ireland).
  • Section 328(1) (entering into, or becoming concerned in, an arrangement, knowingly or suspecting that it will facilitate the acquisition, retention, use or control of criminal property).
  • Section 329(1)(a) (acquiring criminal property).
  • Section 329(1)(b) (using criminal property).
  • Section 329(1)(c) (possessing criminal property).
  • Section 332(1) (failing, as a nominated person, to disclose known or suspected money laundering as soon as reasonably practicable, after the information on which that knowledge or suspicion is based is obtained in consequence of a disclosure under section 337 or 338 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002).
  • Section 333 (disclosing information likely to prejudice any investigation that might be conducted following the disclosure of information by a nominated person under section 337 or 338 of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002).

  • Section 1(1) (being in a gang of 12 or more people who use, or threaten, unlawful violence for a common purpose so as to cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his safety).
  • Section 2(1) (being in a gang of 3 or more people who use, or threaten, unlawful violence for a common purpose so as to cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his safety).
  • Section 3(1) (using, or threatening, unlawful violence so as to cause a person of reasonable firmness present at the scene to fear for his safety).

  • Section 1(1) (dishonestly appropriating another’s property, intending to permanently deprive him of it).
  • Section 8(1) (stealing, and before or at the time of doing so, using force or putting another in fear of being there and then subjected to force).
  • Section 9(1)(a) (entering a building as a trespasser, intending to steal, inflict or attempt to inflict grievous bodily harm or rape).
  • Section 9(1)(b) (having entered a building as a trespasser, stealing or attempting to steal or inflicting or attempting to inflict grievous bodily harm).
  • Section 10(1) (committing burglary with a firearm, imitation firearm, weapon of offence or explosive).
  • Section 12A (aggravated taking of a vehicle).

  • Section 1(1) (intentionally penetrating the vagina, anus or mouth of another with a penis, where the victim does not consent and the offender does not reasonably believe that there is consent).
  • Section 2(1) (intentionally sexually penetrating the vagina or anus of another with a part of the body or anything else, where the victim does not consent and the offender does not reasonably believe that there is consent).
  • Section 3(1) (intentionally sexually touching another, where the victim does not consent and the offender does not reasonably believe that there is consent).
  • Section 4(1) (intentionally causing another to engage in sexual activity, where the victim does not consent and the offender does not reasonably believe that there is consent).
  • Section 5(1) (intentionally sexually penetrating the vagina, anus or mouth of another with a penis, where the victim is under 13).
  • Section 6(1) (intentionally sexually penetrating the vagina or anus of another who is under 13 with a part of the body or anything else).
  • Section 7(1) (intentionally sexually touching a person who is under 13).
  • Section 8(1) (intentionally causing or inciting another who is under 13 to engage in sexual activity).
  • Section 9(1) (intentionally sexually touching another who is 13 or under, or is 16 or under and the offender, who is 18 or over, does not believe that the victim is 16 or over).
  • Section 10(1) (intentionally causing or inciting another to engage in sexual activity, where the victim is 13 or under, or is 16 or under and the offender, who is 18 or over, does not believe that the victim is 16 or over).
  • Section 11(1) (intentionally engaging, for the purpose of sexual gratification, in sexual activity in a place where another is present or can observe and the offender, who is 18 or over, knows, believes or intends the victim to be there and the victim is 13 or under, or is under 16 and the offender does not reasonably believe that the victim is 16 or over).
  • Section 12(1) (intentionally causing, for the purpose of sexual gratification, another to watch or look at an image of a third person engaging in sexual activity, where the victim is 13 or under, or is under 16 and the offender does not reasonably believe that the victim is 16 or over).
  • Section 13(1) (committing an offence under section 9 to 12 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003 which would be an offence if the offender was 18).
  • Section 14(1) (intentionally arranging or facilitating something in any part of the world that, if done, would involve the commission of any offence under sections 9 to 13 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003).
  • Section 25 (intentionally sexually touching a family member, where the offender could reasonably be expected to know that the victim is a family member, and the victim is 13, or is under 18 and the offender does not reasonably believe that the victim is 18 or over).
  • Section 26 (intentionally inciting a family member to touch or allow himself to be touched sexually where the offender could reasonably be expected to know that the victim is a family member, and the victim is 13 or under, or is under 18 and the offender does not reasonably believe that the victim is 18 or over).
  • Section 30(1) (intentionally sexually touching another where the victim is unable to refuse by reason of a mental disorder and the offender could reasonably be expected to know that the victim has a mental disorder that is likely to render him unable to refuse).
  • Section 31(1) (intentionally inciting another to engage in sexual activity where the victim is unable to refuse by reason of a mental disorder and the offender could reasonably be expected to know that the victim has a mental disorder that is likely to render him unable to refuse).
  • Section 32(1) (intentionally engaging in sexual activity for sexual gratification in a place where a person who is unable to refuse by reason of a mental disorder observes it or the offender knows, believes or intends the victim to observe it and the offender knows or could reasonably be expected to know that the victim has a mental disorder that is likely to render him unable to refuse).
  • Section 33(1) (intentionally causing, for sexual gratification, another to watch, or look at an image of, a third person engaging in sexual activity, where the victim is unable to refuse by reason of mental disorder and the offender knows or could reasonably be expected to know that the victim has a mental disorder that is likely to render him unable to refuse).
  • Section 34(1) (intentionally sexually touching another with a mental disorder, where the victim agrees and such agreement is obtained by inducement, threat or deception and the offender knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, about that mental disorder).
  • Section 35(1) (intentionally causing another with a mental disorder, by inducement, threat or deception, to engage in sexual activity and the victim has a mental disorder which the offender knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, about).
  • Section 36(1) (intentionally engaging in sexual activity, for the purpose of sexual gratification, in a place where another with a mental disorder is present or observes it, or the offender knows, believes or intends the victim to observe it, because of inducement, threat or deception and the offender knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, that the victim has a mental disorder).
  • Section 37(1) (intentionally causing another with a mental disorder, by inducement, threat or deception, to watch or look, for the purposes of sexual gratification, at an image of a third person engaging in sexual activity, and the offender knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, that the victim has a mental disorder).
  • Section 38(1) (intentionally sexually touching another with a mental disorder which the offender knows, or could reasonably be expected to know, about where the offender is involved in the victim’s care).
  • Section 39(1) (intentionally causing or inciting another with a mental disorder to engage in sexual activity, where the offender knows or could reasonably be expected to know that the victim has a mental disorder and the offender is involved in the victim’s care).
  • Section 61(1) (intentionally administering a substance to another knowing that the victim does not consent, with the intention of stupefying or overpowering the victim so that sexual activity can be engaged in with the victim).
  • Section 62(1) (committing an offence intending to commit a sexual offence under Part 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003).
  • Section 63(1) (trespassing on premises, knowing that, or being reckless as to whether, trespass is taking place and intending to commit a sexual offence under Part 1 of the Sexual Offences Act 2003).

Are there any exceptions to automatic deportation?

Where condition 1 and 2 is met, a deportation order will always be made by the Home Secretary unless certain exceptions apply. These include:

  • Where the removal of an individual would breach their rights under the European Convention on Human Rights or the UK’s obligations under the Refugee Convention.
  • Where the Home Secretary believes that the individual was under the age of 18 on the date of conviction.
  • Where the individual is subject to extradition proceedings.
  • Where a hospital order, guardianship order, hospital direction or transfer direction under the Mental Health Act 1983 has effect.
  • Where the Home Secretary thinks that removal would contravene the UK’s obligations under the Council of Europe Convention or Action against Trafficking in Human Beings.

Non automatic deportation of foreign nationals

If a foreign national does not meet the automatic deportation threshold, consideration will be given as to whether deportation should be pursued under the Immigration Act 1971 because it would be conducive to the public good.

One of the following criteria would need to be met before a deportation order could be made:

  1. A recommendation for deportation by a court empowered to do so;
  2. The individual has received a custodial sentence of any length for a serious drug offence or gun crime;
  3. The individual has committed a crime and received a custodial sentence of 12 months or more, made up of aggregate or consecutive sentences;
  4. The individual is deemed to be a persistent offender;
  5. The individual has been sentenced to less than 12 months imprisonment but the Secretary of State considers that the offence has caused serious harm either in the UK or in another country.

Decision makers will also take into account:

  • Cautions – Police cautions can be taken into account when considering whether deportation is conducive to the public good.
  • Previous convictions – All previous convictions can be considered.
  • Serious harm offences – The Secretary of State has the discretion to consider whether an offence has caused serious harm. Such an offence may have resulted in a sentence of less than 12 months but may still be grounds on which to pursue deportation.

Deportation of EEA nationals

The deportation of European Economic Area (EEA) nationals is currently restricted by European law.

The ‘Free Movement Directive’ sets out the circumstances in which an EEA national may be expelled but does not specify any particular sentence thresholds that would apply. It requires that deportation must be proportionate and based exclusively on the personal conduct of the individual concerned and the ‘level of threat’ that they pose to public policy or public security. Further information can be found on our EU nationals coming to and staying in the UK page.

An individual cannot be deported solely on the grounds of their previous criminal convictions and further grounds would need to be given in order to justify the deportation of an EEA national who has resided in a Member State for over five or ten years.

This may be subject to change when Britain leaves the EU in 2019.

Deportation under the Early Removal Scheme (ERS)

The Early Removal Scheme (ERS) is a scheme operated by the Ministry of Justice which allows the Secretary of State to remove prisoners who are liable for deportation early (i.e. before they reach their normal release date). This is not a voluntary arrangement and all determinate sentenced foreign national prisoners who have been confirmed as liable for removal, irrespective of sentence length, offence type or country or original, will be considered under this scheme.

The prison governor is responsible for authorising or refusing early removal and generally there are very few reasons why a governor would refuse (for example if an individual had outstanding criminal charges in the UK).

If you’re removed early under the ERS, there is no requirement for you to serve the remaining period of your sentence in custody in the country you’ve been removed to.

How long does a deportation order last for?

When somebody has been deported after being convicted and sentenced to a period of imprisonment of less than four years, the Home Office states that an application for leave to enter the UK will only be considered ten years after the date the order was made.

In the case of an individual who has been convicted and sentenced to a period of imprisonment of at least four years, it is considered that the deportation order will remain in place indefinitely.

The decision to make a deportation order

If it’s decided that deportation is appropriate then a deportation order will be served, setting out why your presence in non-conducive to the public good. The notice will contain details of all the information held by the Home Office on your circumstances at the time the decision was made.

The decision will state that you can, if you wish, make representation within 20 working days as to why you shouldn’t be deported.

Appealing a deportation decision

A deportation order cannot be made if deportation would be contrary to the UK’s obligations under the UN Refugee Convention or the European Convention on Human Rights.

When hearing an appeal against a deportation order following a conviction, tribunals and courts must have regard to the considerations listed in section 117c of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002.

The first issue to be addressed relates to public interest. Namely:

  • The deportation of a foreign national is in the public interest
  • The more serious the offence committed by a foreign national, the greater is the public interest in deporting them.

If you have been sentenced to less than four years, then section 117 states that public interest requires deportation unless you can demonstrate that one of two exceptions applies.

Exception 1

  1. You have been lawfully resident in the UK for most of your life
  2. You are socially and culturally integrated in the UK, and
  3. There would be very significant obstacles to your integration into the country to which it is proposed that you are deported.

Exception 2

You have a genuine and subsisting relationship with a qualifying partner, or a genuine and subsisting relationship with a qualifying child and the effect of your deportation on the partner or child would be unduly harsh.

If you’ve been sentenced to a period of imprisonment of at least four years, then section 117 states that public interest requires deportation unless there are very compelling circumstances, over and above those described in Exceptions 1 and 2.

 

What would constitute ‘compelling circumstances’?

The Supreme Court has suggested that there are a number of factors which would constitute compelling circumstances. These include:

  • How integrated into UK society the individual is in terms of family, employment etc;
  • The quality of the individual’s relationship with any child, partner or other family member in the UK;
  • The extent to which any relationship with family members might reasonably be sustained after deportation, for example by having family members move overseas;
  • The impact of deportation on the need to safeguard and promote the welfare of any child in the UK;
  • The likely strength of the obstacles to an individual’s integration into society in the country of nationality;
  • Any significant risk of an individual re-offending in the UK.

The Court of Appeal has recently upheld the appeal against deportation of a man sentenced to five years imprisonment (Secretary of State for the Home Department v JG (Jamaica) [2019] EWCA Civ 982).

It is one of the few deportation appeal cases, where a deportee convicted of a serious offence successfully resisted deportation, not merely because he had a British child residing in the UK but because of the impact his deportation would have upon the child. Read Iain Halliday’s article A concrete example of how to meet the “very compelling circumstances” deportation test.

 

‘Deport first, appeal later’

Following an amendment to the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 in 2014, a new section was included which provided the Home Secretary with the power to remove an individual from the UK pending their deportation appeal. This meant that appeals could only be pursued after deportation.

However in 2017, the Supreme Court found the practice unlawful [R (on the application of Kiarie) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2017] UKSC], meaning that the Home Office can no longer rely on the ‘deport first, appeal later’ provision. Any appeal against a decision affecting a person’s family and private life can only now be brought from within the UK.

Revoking a deportation order

All the time a deportation order remains in force, you will be unable to return to the UK. You can apply for the order to be revoked but whether or not this will happen depends on the circumstances of the case.

Immigration rules state that an application for the revocation of a deportation order will be considered based on:

  • The grounds on which the order was made;
  • Any representations made in support of the revocation;
  • The interests of the community, including the maintenance of an effective immigration control;
  • The interests of the applicant, including any compassionate circumstances.

Making representation

If you make no representation then a decision to deport you will be based on the information the Home Office have available.

If you take the opportunity to make representation as to why you should not be deported, these will be fully considered. The burden of proof is on you to show why the impact of deportation would breach the Refugee Convention or your human rights, you will need to provide evidence of this impact. Less weight will be given to any representations which cannot be substantiated.

Useful links

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page. More specific details (including addresses and telephone numbers) of some of the organisations listed below can be found here.

More information

  1. For practical information – More information can be found on our section on housing and living in the UK
  2. Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can

  1. Comment on this page below
  2. Send your feedback directly to us
  3. Discuss your views and experiences with others on our online forum

EU nationals coming to and staying in the UK

We are unable to give immigration advice as under UK immigration law, organisations can only provide this is they are registered with the Office of the Immigration Services Commissioner (OISC). Details of specialist immigration organisations can be found on our important links and organisations page.

 

Aim of this page

The aim of this page is to:

  1. provide details about the free movement of EU nationals to the UK
  2. set out some of the reasons why EU nationals may be refused entry to the UK
  3. look at the changes which will take place in the lead up to (and after the) UK leaves the EU, with a particular focus on those EU nationals currently living in the UK

Given the changing nature of the arrangements that will apply after the UK leaves the EU, we will try to keep this information up to date but we appreciate feedback and any suggestions of how it can be improved – email feedback@unlock.org.uk

Why is this important?

Many people assume that providing you’re not on any type of ‘wanted list’ then a criminal record will not stop EU nationals from entering the UK.

However, although a criminal record alone is not the only thing that can stop somebody being permitted entry, the Home Office states that refusal may be given if an individual constitutes ‘a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society’. Therefore, if you’re planning to visit the UK, it’s important to understand the reasons why you may be refused entry.

It’s also important that EU nationals currently living in the UK understand what might happen as the UK leaves the EU, in terms of whether their criminal record might prevent them from staying.

Background

The Free Movement Directive 2004/38EC which came into force in April 2004 provided for citizens of the EU and their family members to:

  • Look for a job in another EU country
  • Work there without needing a work permit
  • Reside there for that purpose
  • Stay there even after employment has finished
  • Enjoy equal treatment with nationals in access to employment, working conditions and all other social and tax advantages.

The directive stated that member states could take measures to restrict the freedom of movement and residence of EU nationals and their family members if they felt there could be grounds of public policy, public security or public health.

On 1 February 2017, the EEA Regulations 2016 were introduced which allowed member states to determine their own requirements of public policy and public security as well as making other substantive changes in respect of public policy and public security decisions.

UK residence documents for EU citizens

Residence card

You don’t need a residence card to confirm you can live in the UK unless you’re:

  1. from outside the European Economic Area (EEA) or Switzerland
  2. an extended family member of someone from the EEA or Switzerland

However, a card can:

  • help you re-enter the country more quickly and easily if you travel abroad
  • show employers you’re allowed to work in the UK
  • help to prove you qualify for certain benefits.

A residents card costs £65 and lasts for five years.

The application form asks that you must disclose details of all criminal convictions.

In accordance with Section 56A of the UK Borders Act 2007 you are required to disclose all spent or unspent convictions. This includes road traffic offences but not fixed penalty notices (such as speeding or parking tickets) unless they were part of a sentence of the court. This includes all drink driving offences. Note: We will carry out criminal record checks on all applicants and dependants.

Permanent residence after five years

You only need to apply for a permanent residence document if:

You will be asked to disclose details of your criminal record as set out above.

Permanent residence before five years

In certain situations, you can automatically be granted permanent residence status in less than five years. This includes:

  • If you have to stop working permanently because of a work related accident or illness that means you’re entitled to a UK pension
  • After you’ve been resident in the UK for 2 years if you have to stop working or being self-employed because of an accident or illness (‘permanent incapacity)
  • After you’ve been resident in the UK for 3 years if you (a) reach State Pension age; (b) retire early; (c) start work or self-employment in another EU country.

Restrictions on entry to the UK on the grounds of public policy or public security

When making a decision to refuse admission, exclude, refuse or revoke residence or remove an EEA national or their family member from the UK on the grounds of public policy or public security, officials must ensure that any decision made is in accordance with the following principles:

The decision must comply with the principle of proportionality

This means that the measures to restrict an individual’s free movement rights must be necessary and appropriate to protect the fundamental interests of society.

The decision must be based exclusively on the personal conduct of the person concerned

This means that a decision can only be taken with regard to the conduct of the individual concerned and the circumstances must be assessed on a case-by-case basis taking account of any available evidence. It is not necessary for a person to have criminal convictions for a decision to be made on public policy or public security grounds, if their personal conduct is assessed to be a threat.

The personal conduct of the individual concerned must represent a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society

  • Genuine – the threat must be a realistic one
  • Present – the threat must exist but it does not need to be imminent. An indication of a present threat may include intelligence or any precautionary measures which have been imposed on the individual for example a licence condition imposed because there is a genuine and present risk.
  • Sufficiently serious – the threat must be serious enough to affect one of the fundamental interests of society but does not need to be a serious threat.

It’s not necessary to demonstrate that an individual is likely to commit a specific type of offence but when considering whether an individual poses a threat, the following factors will also be considered:

  • Nature of offence – in the case of deportation, the government’s view is that certain types of offences weigh in favour of deportation. These are offences which typically result in a custodial sentence or a requirement to sign the Violent and Sex Offender’s Register.
  • Length of sentence – in most cases, the length of sentence will provide a strong indication of the severity of the offence, although each case will be considered on its own merits.
  • Rehabilitation – the duration of any rehabilitative efforts will be relevant to the public policy decision. Where such efforts are in their infancy (for example a few weeks in the community or a few sessions undertaken), these will not be considered useful to determine a risk of re-offending.

Matters isolated from the particulars of the case or which relate to considerations of general prevention do not justify the decision

Decisions must be made on a case-by-case basis, considering all the facts and circumstances of the individual case.

The individual’s previous criminal convictions do not in themselves justify the decision

A decision made on public policy or public security grounds cannot be made on criminal convictions alone. The nature of the previous offending including the number and seriousness of previous convictions will form part of the assessment of the persons present conduct. On occasion, cautions and warnings can be taken into account.

The decision may be taken on preventative grounds, even in the absence of a previous criminal conviction, provided the grounds are specific to the person

A decision may be made to prevent an individual from carrying out certain, specific types of conduct. This is particularly important in the national security context, where there is reliable intelligence to suggest that an individual or their family member may pose a threat to public security.

Additional considerations for a person resident in the UK

If you are resident in the UK, additional considerations must be taken into account when deciding whether you should be excluded from the UK. These include:

  • Age – This will have greater significance if you are under the age of 18.
  • State of health – Your physical and mental health will be considered and, in particular, the implications of any decision on your health. If you’re claiming ill-health, you would need to provide substantial medical evidence from medical professionals.
  • Family and economic situation – If you have dependants in the UK, such as children who are financially or physically dependent on you, this will be taken into account.
  • Length of residence – Generally the shorter the length of residence, the less likely it is that you will have established significant links to the UK and the easier you would find it to be able to integrate into the country you are being returned to. This would include anybody who has not resided in the UK for a continuous period of 5 years and therefore have not acquired a permanent right of residence.
  • Social and cultural integration – This considers the degree to which you have integrated in the UK. This could include links to family and friends, length of residence, properties or business interests in the UK. A criminal record would be an indication of a lack of integration especially if the nature of your offending was anti-social behaviour against a local community or offending that caused a serious or long-term impact on a victim or victims (for example burglary or sexual assault). Any type of custodial sentence would also demonstrate that you were unable to become an integral part of society.

What protection against restriction of Free Movement rights and removal is there?

Article 28 of the EEA Regulations provides additional protection to you in relation to decisions to remove you or family members from the UK.

Individuals with a permanent right of residence

If you or a family member has established a permanent right of residence, a decision to refuse admission, exclude, revoke residence or remove you from the UK, will only be permitted on serious grounds to public policy or public security. However, there is no definition of serious grounds in the regulations.

EEA nationals with 10 years’ residence in the UK

The regulations state that a decision to refuse admission, exclude, revoke residence or remove you from the UK is only permitted on imperative grounds of public security. Where an EEA national either:

  • Has resided in the UK for a continuous period of at least 10 years prior to the decision*
  • Is  under the age of 18, unless the relevant decision is in the best interests of the person concerned, as provided for by the Convention of the Rights of a Child.

Imperative grounds are not defined in the Regulations and may be interpreted to include serious criminality, such as drug dealing as part of an organised group.

*Any time spent in prison or a young offenders institute does not count as legal residence and will interrupt continuity of residence when assessing whether you or a family member has accrued 10 years residence.

What is meant by ‘fundamental interests of society’

Schedule 1 of the EEA Regulations 2016 states that consideration will be given to the fundamental interests of society when determining whether it is appropriate to restrict a person’s free movement on the grounds of public policy and public security.

A list of the types of behaviour considered contrary to each fundamental interests of society is set out below with some examples provided. This is not an exhaustive list.

The fundamental interests of society include:

Examples:

  • Marriages of convenience
  • Human trafficking
  • Use of fraudulent documents
  • Facilitating illegal entry to the UK
  • Circumventing the immigration system
  • Facilitating the circumvention of the immigration system

Examples:

  • Inciting public disorder
  • Anti-social behaviour such as criminal damage, drug offences and offences committed to fund a drug or alcohol habit, or committed while under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Examples:

  • Low level criminality
  • Acquisitive crime including theft and shoplifting

Examples:

  • Tobacco or alcohol smuggling
  • Tax fraud
  • Non-payment of tax or duties owed

Examples:

  • Benefit fraud

Examples:

  • Drugs offences (smuggling, supplying, manufacturing drugs)

Examples:

  • Persistent shoplifting

Examples:

  • High harm criminality
  • Human trafficking

Examples:

  • High harm criminality
  • Human trafficking

Examples

  • Entry of a child if there are concerns as to why they are coming to the UK or  who they are travelling with

Behaviour which may lead to a public policy decision

Criminality

Your criminal behaviour will be taken into account when making a decision on public policy or public security grounds even if you have not received any criminal convictions providing there is sufficient, corroborated law enforcement evidence to underpin a decision. Criminal behaviour of this type may be evidenced by either a domestic or overseas conviction.

Persistent offending is considered contrary to the fundamental interests of society. Persistent offending includes offences, which if taken in isolation, may otherwise not meet the requirements of regulation 27.

An individual is considered to be a persistent offender if they show a pattern of offending over a period of time. This can mean a series of offences committed in a fairly short time frame, or which escalate in seriousness over time, or a history of minor offences. Non-custodial sentences, suspended sentences, restraining orders, anti-social behaviour orders, cautions etc can all be taken into consideration.

Marriage, civil partnership and durable partnership of convenience

The EEA Regulations 2016 define a marriage or civil partnership of convenience as a marriage or civil partnership entered into for the purpose of using these regulations as a means to circumvent:

  • Immigration Rules applying to non-EEA nationals
  • Any other criteria that the party to the marriage or civil partnership of convenience would otherwise have to meet in order to enjoy a right to reside under these regulations

A non-EEA national who has entered into a marriage or civil partnership of convenience will be treated as an immigration offender.

Fraudulently obtaining a right to reside

Paragraph 6(a) of the Regulations state that it is consistent with public policy and public security requirements to refuse, terminate or withdraw an EEA right where it involves obtaining, attempting to obtain or assisting the fraudulent acquisition of a right to reside under EEA Regulations.

Evasion of taxes and duties

The evasion of taxes and duties is considered contrary to the fundamental rights of society. If you are found to have in your possession goods such as tobacco or alcohol in large quantities which are not consistent with personal use, consideration will be given as to whether they are attempting to evade the payment of duty.

Decision to refuse admission to the UK

Border Force officers can refuse admission to an EEA national or their family members on the grounds of public policy or public security. Refusal will be given to anybody subject to a valid deportation or exclusion order unless they are seeking entry to attend an appeal hearing and have permission to do so.

If the decision is made to refuse entry then your passport will not be endorsed.

Once you’ve passed through immigration control, you are considered to have been admitted to the UK unless you entered in contravention of a deportation order or exclusion order.

A decision to grant admission does not necessarily preclude a decision being made on public policy or public security grounds at a later date.

Decision to refuse, renew or revoke documentation

Applications to issue or renew documentation may be refused on public policy or public security grounds.

A decision may be made to revoke documentation where you cease to have a right of residence on public policy grounds or where you’ve never had a right of residence in the first place.

Decision to deport from the UK

The EEA Regulations allows for the deportation of EEA nationals or their family members on the grounds of public policy or public security. The government will pursue a deportation order when a person’s conduct represents a genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat affecting one of the fundamental interests of society.

You will be allowed one month to leave the UK voluntarily, beginning on the date on which you are notified of the decision to remove you although you may be removed earlier:

  • In duly substantial cases of urgency (for example if a prisoner was involved in prison riots)
  • Where you are detailed pursuant to the sentence or order of any court
  • Where you have entered in breach of a deportation or exclusion order.

If you are liable to deportation you must be notified in writing and given the opportunity to make representation. You must be advised of the public policy or public security reasons for your intended removal from the UK.

Once the deportation order is in force, your free movement rights are restricted and you are required to leave the UK. If you do not comply with the requirements to leave then your removal can be enforced.

Deportation orders remain in place until revoked by the Secretary of State for the period specified in the order. Once deported, you are prohibited from returning to the UK unless you successfully apply to have the order revoked or until the end of the order specified.

Re-entry to the UK following a deportation order

If you’ve been deported from the UK on the grounds of public policy or public security, you will be prohibited from entering the UK until the deportation order is revoked or for the period specified in the deportation order.

The EEA Regulations introduced some time-limiting deportation orders where it was felt that an indefinite re-entry ban would be disproportionate. The table below gives an indication of the length of the re-entry restrictions. These are only a guide and individuals will be dealt with on a case-by-case basis.

Practical effects of a public policy or public security decision

The decision to remove somebody on the grounds of public policy or public security will only be taken after careful consideration of an individual’s circumstances and the risk they pose.

If you are subject to a deportation decision, then it is possible that restrictions will be placed on your residency and/or employment.

Appealing a decision

Where a public policy decision was made before 1 February 2017 under the EEA Regulations 2006, an appeal against the decision will be considered under the EEA Regulations 2006.

Where a deportation decision was made on or after 1 February 2017 under the EEA Regulations 2016, an appeal against the decision will be considered under the EEA Regulations 2016.

If you’ve been served with an EEA decision, you can appeal against that decision to the First-tier Tribunal. In the appeal you will have to demonstrate why the EEA decision was wrong. Further information can be found in the Home Office Rights of Appeal document.

The EU Settlement Scheme – settled and pre-settled status

Our information the EU Settlement Scheme is available here.

Useful links

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page. More specific details (including addresses and telephone numbers) of some of the organisations listed below can be found here.

More information

  1. For practical information – More information on housing and living in the UK
  2. Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can:

  1. Comment on this page below
  2. Send your feedback directly to us
  3. Discuss your views and experiences with others on our online forum

 

 

 

Travelling to China

Aim of this page

The aim of this page is to set out whether people travelling to China require a visa to travel and if so, whether there is any necessity for them to disclose their criminal record.

Why is this important?

Applying for any type of visa can be expensive and time consuming, and it’s important to know therefore what, if anything, you’ll need to disclose about your criminal record. Also, if you do disclose a conviction, how it might affect your chances of success in getting a visa.

Do I need a visa to go to China?

British nationals wishing to enter mainland China (but not Hong Kong or Macao) will require a visa.

As of 11th January 2016, in line with reciprocal visa arrangements between China and the UK, the Chinese Embassy and Consulates will issue two year multi-entry visas for eligible British nationals for stays of up to 90 days for commercial/trade activities and for individuals travelling as a tourist or to visit family members/relatives.

What do they ask about your criminal record on the visa application form?

The application form asks:

‘Do you have any criminal record in China or any other country?  Yes/No’

Chinese Visa application form

There is very little guidance as to what the Chinese consider should be disclosed. The Embassy states that disclosure of a conviction would not automatically stop you from getting a visa but you should answer the question honestly so that you do not risk being turned away on arrival at the border or expelled after entry in China. Any conviction given at either a magistrates or crown court should be disclosed to comply with Chinese law.

How long does it take to get a visa?

The normal processing time is four working days providing you have all the necessary documentation and have a passport with at least six months validity.

Where can I apply for a visa and what’s the cost?

As of 1 November 2018, all applicants aged between 14 and 70 will need to make their visa application in person at a Chinese Visa Application Centre. As part of the application process, biometric data (scanned fingerprints) will now have to be provided. The price varies from $30 to $140 depending on your nationality, the type of visa you are applying for and the country where you are applying from.

Additional information

Drug offences

There are extremely severe penalties for drug offences in China, including the death penalty. The Chinese authorities undertake random drug testing on foreign nationals including on entry to the country. If you test positive you can be prosecuted regardless of where and when you consumed the drugs.

If you do disclose details of a drug offence on a visa application, it is our belief that your visa is likely to be refused.

Personal experience

The case study below relates to an individual helped by our helpline:

Discuss with others

Read and share your experiences on our online forum.

Key sections include:

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page.

More information

  1. To discuss this issue with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
  2. Questions – If yo have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can:

  1. Comment on this page (below)
  2. Send your feedback directly to us
  3. Discuss your views and experiences with others on our online forum
  4. Share your personal story by contributing to our online magazine, theRecord

This page was last fully reviewed and updated in March 2018. If you’ve spotted something that needs updating, please let us know by emailing the details to advice@unlock.org.uk.

 

 

Travelling to the US – Do I need a visa?

Aim of this page

This section looks at the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) and sets out how to determine whether your offence makes you eligible to travel to the US under the VWP or whether you’ll need to apply for a visa.

It forms part of our information on travelling to the US including: 

Why is this important?

For anybody considering travelling to the US, it’s important to know whether you would be eligible to travel under the Visa Waiver Program (VWP) or if you will need to apply for a visa through the US Embassy.

Generally, those travelling to the US for leisure or business stays of less than 90 days can travel under the VWP. However, if you’ve been arrested or convicted of certain offences, you may not be eligible.

The Visa Waiver Program (VWP) or visa?

The VWP enables nationals of participating countries, including the United Kingdom, to travel to the US for tourism or business stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.

You are able to travel under the VWP if you’ve received an authorisation to travel under the VWP through the Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA). The ESTA process asks questions regarding criminal convictions. If you answer ‘yes’ to any of the questions asked during the ESTA process, you will be told that you are not eligible to travel under the VWP and will have to apply for a visa instead.

What questions are asked on the ESTA form?

The questions asked about criminal convictions on the ESTA website are as follows:

  1. Have you ever been arrested or convicted for a crime that resulted in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority?
  2. Have you ever violated any law related to possessing, using or distributing illegal drugs?
  3. Do you seek to engage in or have you ever engaged in terrorist activities, espionage, sabotage or genocide?
  4. Have you ever committed fraud or misrepresented yourself to obtain, or assist others to obtain, a visa or entry into the United States?

The ESTA form can be accessed online.

There is an online ‘wizard’ on the London US Embassy website which can be used to help you to determine your eligibility to travel under the VWP. In the section on criminal convictions it asks:

Have you ever been arrested or convicted for any reason in any country, even if the arrest did not lead to a conviction, or do you have a criminal record? Please note: the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to US visa law. If you are unsure, press YES.”

If you select “No”, you are able to proceed using the ESTA process. If you select “Yes”, the following text is displayed:

Some applicants are uncertain how to answer the question, “have you ever been arrested?”

In general, minor motoring offences outside the US that were disposed of by paying a ticket by mail have no bearing on admission to the United States. Travellers with minor traffic offences that did not result in their arrest and/or conviction for the offence may travel visa free, provided they are otherwise qualified. If you are not sure whether or not you are eligible to travel visa free, the only way to resolve this question would be to apply for a visa. The Embassy and the Live Operator Information Service cannot provide any further guidance on this matter until you appear in person before a consular officer.

If a traffic offence occurred while you were in the United States, and you have an outstanding fine against you, or if you did not attend your court hearing, it is possible there may be a warrant out for your arrest and you will experience significant problems when applying for admission at the US port of entry. The Embassy cannot assist you in this regard. You must resolve the issue before travelling, by contacting the court where you were to appear. If you do not know the address of the court then information is available here.

Is the full extent of your history of legal violations limited solely to minor traffic offences that did not result in your arrest and/or conviction?”

If you answer “Yes”, you are able to proceed using the ESTA process. If you answer “No” to the further questions, it states the following:

Not Eligible for Travel on Visa Waiver Program

You are not eligible to travel on the Visa Waiver Program, and must possess a valid visa for entry into the United States.

Please note that the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act does not apply to US visa law. If you attempt to travel without a visa, you may be refused entry into the United States at your personal expense.”

The flow chart below may further help you to establish your eligibility to travel under the VWP.

Follow the flow chart to determine whether you can travel on an ESTA

 

How do I classify my own conviction for the purposes of the VWP?

You will notice that the question asked by the ESTA process differs from that mentioned in the Visa Wizard section.

Through the Visa Wizard section of the US Embassy website, a general question is asked about any arrests or convictions, and if you answer “Yes” it advises that you have to apply for a visa.

However, through the ESTA process, the question that is asked relates to arrests or convictions:

  1. Resulting in serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority (these types of offences were previously referred to as crimes of moral turpitude)
  2. Violating any law related to possessing, using or distributing illegal drugs.

Therefore, if you have been arrested or convicted, but for an offence that isn’t covered by the questions asked on the ESTA, it isn’t clear whether you have to apply for a visa or not.

Under the eligibility to travel under the VWP, it states you are able to travel under a VWP if you have received an authorisation to travel under the VWP through the Electronic System for Travel Authorisation (ESTA). Therefore, whether you are able to travel under the VWP depends on how you answer the question that is put to you as part of the ESTA process.

It would therefore appear that so long as you can answer “No” to the question asked as part of the ESTA process, you are able to travel under the VWP.

There is an anomaly here between the ESTA and the on-line guidance. We’ve highlighted this to the Embassy but we would suggest that you work from the questions on the ESTA form.

What does ‘serious damage to property, or serious harm to another person or government authority’ mean?

The majority of individuals unable to travel under the VWP will be unable to do so because they have been arrested or convicted of a crime involving “serious damage to property” or “serious harm to another person or government authority.” These types of offences were previously referred to as ‘crimes of moral turpitude’ as part of the ESTA process and will still be referred to in this way when applying for a visa.

Moral turpitude is a legal concept in the United States that refers to conduct that is considered contrary to community standards of justice, honesty or good morals. You are potentially ineligible for a visa under Section 212(a)(2)(A)(i)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act if you have been convicted of a statutory offence which involves moral turpitude.

Crimes involving moral turpitude are grouped into three general categories. They are:

  1. Crimes committed against property (for example, arson, blackmail, burglary, larceny, robbery, fraud, false pretences, theft, receiving stolen property);
  2. Crimes against governmental authority (for example bribery, tax evasion, perjury, fraud against government functions); and
  3. Crimes committed against persons, family, relationships and sexual morality (for example, serious assaults, gross indecency, lewdness, contributing to the delinquency of a minor, murder, voluntary manslaughter, rape).

We have put together a list of offences detailing how they are categorised:

The presence or absence of moral turpitude is determined by the nature of the offence, and not by the acts underlying the conviction. Furthermore, the degree of punishment meted out does not determine whether the crime is a ‘crime involving moral turpitude (CIMT);” crimes punished by only fines or even less have still been held to be CIMT.

The determination of whether a crime is a CIMT is a matter of US law, regardless of where the conviction took place. Whether or not a US or foreign conviction is a CIMT rendering an individual ineligible for a visa or inadmissible to the US is a complex question requiring careful legal analysis of the facts and the law. In important situations, you may benefit from seeking the advice of a specialist US immigration legal firm.

What does ‘illegal’ drugs mean?

You are ineligible to travel under the VWP if you have ever violated any law related to possessing, using or distributing illegal drugs.

The term ‘illegal use of drugs’ means the use of drugs, the possession or distribution of which is unlawful under the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 801 et seq). Such term does not include the use of a drug taken under supervision by a licensed health care professional, or other uses authorised by the Controlled Substances Act or other provisions of Federal law.

The term ‘drug’ means a controlled substance, as defined in schedules I-V of section 202 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 812).

Annex – Section 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act

Below is an extract of the Immigration and Nationality Act. This sets out the general classes of people ineligible to receive visas, ineligible for admission, and the process of waivers of inadmissibility.

*(2) Criminal and related grounds –

(A) Conviction of certain crimes –

(i) in general – Except as provided in clause (ii), any alien convicted of, or who admits having committed, or who admits committing acts which constitute the essential elements of –

(I) a crime involving moral turpitude (other than a purely political offense or an attempt or conspiracy to commit such a crime), or

(II) a violation of (or a conspiracy or attempt to violate) any law or regulation of a State, the United States, or a foreign country relating to a controlled substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802)), is inadmissible.

(ii) Exception – Clause (i)(I) shall not apply to an alien who committed only one crime if –

(I) the crime was committed when the alien was under 18 years of age, and the crime was committed (and the alien released from any confinement to a prison or correctional institution imposed for the crime) more than 5 years before the date of application for a visa or other documentation and the date of application for admission to the United States, or

(II) the maximum penalty possible for the crime of which the alien was convicted (or which the alien admits having committed or of which the acts that the alien admits having committed constituted the essential elements) did not exceed imprisonment for one year and, if the alien was convicted of such crime, the alien was not sentenced to a term of imprisonment in excess of 6 months (regardless of the extent to which the sentence was ultimately executed).

(B) Multiple criminal convictions – Any alien convicted of 2 or more offenses (other than purely political offenses), regardless of whether the conviction was in a single trial or whether the offenses arose from a single scheme of misconduct and regardless of whether the offenses involved moral turpitude, for which the aggregate sentences to confinement were 5 years or more is inadmissible.

Discuss this with others

Read and share your experiences on our online forum.

Key sections include:

Useful links

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page. More specific details (including addresses and telephone numbers) of some of the organisations listed below can be found here.

More information

  1. For practical information – More information on travelling to the US
  2. To read personal stories – You can read stories about this posted on theRecord, our online magazine under the tag of travelling to the USA
  3. To discuss this with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
  4. Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline.

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can:

  1. Send your feedback directly to us
  2. Discuss your views and experiences with  others on our online forum
  3. Share your story by contributing to our online magazine, theRecord

This page was last fully reviewed and updated in July 2017. If you’ve spotted anything that needs updating, please let us know by emailing the details to advice@unlock.org.uk.

 

 

Travelling to Japan

Aim of this page

The aim of this page is to set out the entry requirements for travelling to Japan and when you may be asked to disclose details of your criminal record.

It’s part of our information on travelling abroad.

Why is this important?

Applying for any type of visa can be expensive and time consuming and so it’s important to know what, if anything, you’ll need to disclose about your criminal record. Also, if you do disclose a conviction, it’s useful to know how this will impact on you being granted permission to enter Japan.

Do I need a visa to travel to Japan?

If you are a British citizen or British national, you will be able to enter Japan as a visitor for up to 90 days without a visa. You will need to provide evidence that you have a return or onward ticket.

With a criminal record, you can still travel without a visa for up to 90 days

If you have a different type of British nationality or you wish to enter Japan for another purpose (for example a longer stay, study, settlement or employment), then you will need to apply for the relevant visa.

What do they ask about criminal convictions on the visa application form?

If you need to apply for a visa, then it’s important to note that Japan has some of the strictest conviction-related bars to entry, covering many offences and having little regard to the length of stay or the purpose of the stay.

An excerpt from the visa application form (as of September 2016) can be found below.

Japan Visa application form

The Japanese Ministry of Justice has interpreted the restrictions imposed by Japan’s Immigration Control and Refugee Recognition Act to bar entry to anybody sentenced to more than a year in prison, and anyone convicted of a drug offence, no matter how old or minor the conviction is. Further information can be found at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan.

Are there any other occasions when I would need to disclose my criminal record?

If you are visiting Japan as a tourist or visiting family or friends, you will need to complete an Embarkation and Disembarkation (EDcard) before being allowed entry into Japan. There is a question on the form which asks:-

Have you ever been found guilty in a criminal case in Japan or in another country?’

Whether you disclose your conviction on the EDcard is something only you can decide. Japanese Immigration have no links to the Police National Computer and officials would need to seek permission through Interpol to be provided with criminal record information. We have little evidence on what happens if you do tick yes to this question.

Have you travelled to Japan and ticked yes to this question? What happened? Let us know

However, when you present your EDcard, the immigration officer will take your photograph and will scan both your index fingers. This is part of recently introduced anti-terrorism laws but can worry some people who believe that it will flag up their criminal record – they don’t have access to UK police records, so this process is only likely to flag something up if the Japanese authorities hold any information about you.

I have just returned from a trip to Japan and am not the sort of person to lie on a form so did tick “yes” to the question, “Have you ever been found guilty in a criminal case in Japan or in another country?”

In my case my conviction was within what Japan deems acceptable as it was not a prison sentence of more than 1 year and not related to any of their restrictions.

The border guard asked me why I had ticked “yes”, and I gave a brief description of my conviction. I was then taken to a side room and after a short wait another guard handed me a form in English to fill in about my conviction. I filled this in and handed it back with my basic DBS check certificate which I had recently received and had decided to take with me. This disclosed my conviction as it was unspent. They seemed happy that I had bought a certificate disclosing my conviction with me and took the form, my basic DBS check and my passport and went behind a counter for a few minutes. When they came back they had put a normal temporary visitor sticker in my passport and one of the guards showed me across the border.

I would say the whole procedure only took about 10 minutes to complete, so I wasn’t delayed for too long.

From my experience I would say that if your conviction is within what is OK for Japan then don’t be afraid to tick the “yes” box. They did seem happy I took my Basic DBS check with me. I don’t think it’s necessary but it seem to speed things up.

Discuss with others

Read and share your experiences on our online forum.

Key sections include:

Below you will find links to useful websites relating to this page.

More information

  1. To discuss this with others – Read and share your experiences on our online forum
  2. Questions – If you have any questions about this, you can contact our helpline

Get involved

Help us to add value to this information. You can:

  1. Comment on this page (below)
  2. Send your feedback directly to us
  3. Discuss your views and  experiences with others on our online forum
  4. Share your personal story by contributing to our online magazine, theRecord 

This page was last fully reviewed and updated in September 2016. If you’ve spotted something that needs updating, please let us know by emailing the details to advice@unlock.org.uk.

 

We want to make sure that our website is as helpful as possible.

Letting us know if you easily found what you were looking for or not enables us to continue to improve our service for you and others.

Was it easy to find what you were looking for?

Thank you for your feedback.

12.5 million people have criminal records in the UK. We need your help to help them.

Help support us now