In an interesting development to the issue of the ‘google-effect’ and spent convictions, the Guardian has reported that Google has been ordered by the Information Commissioner’s Office to remove nine links to current news stories about older reports which themselves were removed from search results under the ‘right to be forgotten’ ruling.
The search engine had previously removed links relating to a 10 year-old criminal offence by an individual after requests were made as the offence is now spent under the Rehabilitation of Offenders Act.
Removal of the original links from Google’s search results led to new news posts detailing the removals, which were then indexed by Google’s search engine. Google refused to remove these further links, which included details of the original criminal offence, despite them forming part of search results for the individual’s name, arguing that they are an essential part of a recent news story and in the public interest.
Google now has 35 days from the 18 August to remove the links from its search results for the individual’s name.
We will be keeping a close eye on how this case develops, and hope that Google will take the sensible steps of removing the links and upholding the privacy of the individual concerned.
Useful links
- Have you managed to get details of your convictions removed from search results? Let us know – send us your experience
- More information on issue of the ‘google-effect’ and spent convictions can be found on our policy page here.
- We also have practical information for people dealing with the google-effect on our information site.
Comments
Add CommentLeave a Reply
Learn more about this topic
Most popular articles from Unlock
Do you need help & support with an issue you’re facing?
We provide support and advice for people in England and Wales who need guidance with either their own, or someone else’s, criminal record.
Please use the search box to start typing your issue. If you cannot find an answer to your problem then you’ll be given options to contact us directly.
This happened to me as well.
I had a very historic minor conviction reported in a local newspaper.
This ended up being about 12 different URL’s.
Google removed some but not all which was very strange.
In the end I instructed a professional firm, I wont name them but I will say they are in London and have loads of trustpilot reviews.
They got everything removed under “Section 10” and “Article 17” within 6 weeks, but they still allowed me to split my payments over 6 months.
I am very happy now nothing shows up in search results.