When someone is the victim of a serious crime – like sexual assault or serious violence – the impact can last for years or even a lifetime. In recognition of this, the government allows victims to apply for Criminal Injuries Compensation, which is paid according to a tariff of injuries.
However, since 2012 a rule has been in place which automatically prevents many people with unspent convictions from accessing compensation. There is no discretion in the scheme to distinguish between someone who sustains an injury while committing a crime themselves, and someone whose own conviction is completely unrelated to what they have suffered. Find out more about how the scheme works.
Last year a brave woman called Kim Mitchell successfully took the government to court about this rule, with the High Court ruling that the government must carry out a public consultation on the issue. Kim’s story demonstrates the clear injustice of the rule; having survived childhood sexual abuse and finally seen the perpetrator brought to justice years later, she was denied compensation for the years of trauma she had suffered – because she had an unspent conviction for a minor public order offence.
What you can do
If you agree with us that this rule (called the ‘exclusionary rule’) is unjust, please respond to the government consultation by 5 August. To help you, we’ve put together some key points you may want to include – but please write your response in your own words. If you’ve been personally affected by the exclusionary rule, we encourage you to include how the experience has impacted you.
Read our guidance and respond.
It’s crucial that we send a clear message to the government that the public believes in fairness, justice and support for all victims – not just those who have never found themselves on the wrong side of the law.
Comments
Add CommentLeave a Reply
Learn more about this topic
- Parliamentary questions highlight the barriers facing many people with criminal records
- Proposed changes to social housing allocation may disqualify people with criminal records
- Creating connections: share your views
- Update on Unlock CEO recruitment
- Unlock’s training placement: reflecting on my time so far
Most popular articles from Unlock
- Take action for a fairer criminal records system
- Civil death, civic dignity: exploring dis/enfranchisement through art
- Prisoners to get Halifax bank accounts as they prepare for release
- A momentous day for tens of thousands of people with old and minor criminal records
- Moving on: Homelessness and leaving prison
Do you need help & support with an issue you’re facing?
We provide support and advice for people in England and Wales who need guidance with either their own, or someone else’s, criminal record.
Please use the search box to start typing your issue. If you cannot find an answer to your problem then you’ll be given options to contact us directly.
Popular advice
- International Child Protection Certificate (for working overseas)
- Youth rehabilitation order (under 18)
- Travelling to the US – Will I get a visa?
- Travelling to the UK
- Savings accounts and credit union accounts in prison
- Information: Relationships, children and dealing with social services
- Information contained on UK passports
- What will be disclosed on a basic DBS check?
Brilliant work guys!! It’s about time victims of crimes such as CSE GBV were recognised as victims of the CJS.
I’ve responded and argued that this should go further and victims should have records removed completely and compensated for being criminalised in the first place, moreover, a massive over haul of the CJS as a whole.
Well done keep up the brilliant work!